{"id":2584,"date":"2019-07-24T18:00:06","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T22:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/uber-class-action-settlement-update\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:30:55","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:30:55","slug":"%e4%bc%98%e6%ad%a5%e9%9b%86%e4%bd%93%e8%a1%8c%e5%8a%a8%e5%92%8c%e8%a7%a3%e6%9b%b4%e6%96%b0","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/%e7%99%bd%e7%9a%ae%e4%b9%a6\/%e4%bc%98%e6%ad%a5%e9%9b%86%e4%bd%93%e8%a1%8c%e5%8a%a8%e5%92%8c%e8%a7%a3%e6%9b%b4%e6%96%b0\/","title":{"rendered":"\u4f18\u6b65\u96c6\u4f53\u8bc9\u8bbc\u548c\u89e3\u66f4\u65b0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A California federal judge has tentatively approved an increased $395,000 settlement in a class action alleging Uber denied drivers their fair share of riders&#8217; payments, saying the deal is still on the low end, but fair.<\/p>\n<p>The revamped deal made three notable changes, according to Judge Alsup. Each class member will receive at least $20 from the settlement, and any class members who were set to receive more than $20 based on their driving histories will still receive the same amount they were to get under the previous deal, according to the order.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, Dulberg\u2019s attorneys at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law360.com\/firms\/napoli-shkolnik\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u90a3\u4e0d\u52d2\u65af\u4ec0\u79d1\u5c14\u5c3c\u514b PLLC<\/a>\u00a0agreed to cap their request for attorneys fees at 25% of the net settlement amount, down from the nearly 30% they had previously requested.<\/p>\n<p>Dulberg and the class are represented by Salvatore C. Badala of Napoli Shkolnik PLLC.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u52a0\u5229\u798f\u5c3c\u4e9a\u5dde\u4e00\u540d\u8054\u90a6\u6cd5\u5b98\u6682\u65f6\u6279\u51c6\u4e86\u96c6\u4f53\u8bc9\u8bbc\u4e2d\u589e\u52a0 $395,000 \u7684\u548c\u89e3\uff0c\u6307\u63a7\u4f18\u6b65\u62d2\u7edd\u53f8\u673a\u516c\u5e73\u5206\u4eab\u4e58\u5ba2\u7684\u4ed8\u6b3e\uff0c\u5e76\u8868\u793a\u8be5\u4ea4\u6613\u4ecd\u5728\u2026\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":297,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[61,64,287],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2584","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-class-action","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2584"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}