{"id":13774,"date":"2022-09-15T08:31:51","date_gmt":"2022-09-15T12:31:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/18fbf770e8.nxcli.io\/?post_type=whitepapers&#038;p=13774"},"modified":"2022-09-15T09:59:33","modified_gmt":"2022-09-15T13:59:33","slug":"ca-federal-judge-on-plaintiff-side-in-erisa-suit","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/%e7%99%bd%e7%9a%ae%e4%b9%a6\/ca-federal-judge-on-plaintiff-side-in-erisa-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"ERISA \u8bc9\u8bbc\u539f\u544a\u65b9\u7684\u52a0\u5dde\u8054\u90a6\u6cd5\u5b98"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A California federal judge ruled Cigna Health &amp; Life Insurance Co. and MultiPlan Inc. must face claims from a proposed class of patients who allege the companies colluded to underpay for certain types of mental health and substance use disorder treatments in violation of federal benefits and anti-corruption laws.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>U.S. District Judge Davila held that the proposed class of proposed class of employee health plan beneficiaries had plausibly alleged the companies engaged in a scheme to defraud patients and providers in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, to the extent they were based on predicate acts of mail and wire fraud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In addition to upholding RICO claims, Judge Davila&#8217;s order also upheld claims alleging Multiplan had breached its fiduciary duty to plan participants in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, holding that allegations supporting the patients&#8217; RICO claims also supported the ERISA claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u9ad8\u7ea7\u52a9\u7406 <a href=\"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/%e5%be%8b%e5%b8%88\/%e6%b8%a9%e8%bf%aa%e7%b1%b3%e5%88%87%e5%b0%94\/\">\u6e29\u8fea\u00b7A\u00b7\u7c73\u5207\u5c14<\/a> is one of the attorneys representing the proposed class. <br><br><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u52a0\u5229\u798f\u5c3c\u4e9a\u8054\u90a6\u6cd5\u5b98\u88c1\u5b9a Cigna Health &amp; Life Insurance Co. \u548c MultiPlan Inc. \u5fc5\u987b\u9762\u5bf9\u62df\u8bae\u7684\u4e00\u7c7b\u60a3\u8005\u63d0\u51fa\u7684\u7d22\u8d54\uff0c\u8fd9\u4e9b\u60a3\u8005\u6307\u63a7\u8fd9\u4e9b\u516c\u53f8\u4e32\u901a\u5c11\u4ed8\u2026\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":26,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[303],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-13774","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-erisa","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/13774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/13774\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=13774"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/zh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=13774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}