{"id":2643,"date":"2019-10-24T15:17:35","date_gmt":"2019-10-24T19:17:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/historic-260m-opioid-deal\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:34:18","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:34:18","slug":"tarihi-260m-opioid-anlasmasi","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/beyaz-kagitlar\/tarihi-260m-opioid-anlasmasi\/","title":{"rendered":"Tarihi $260m Opioid Anla\u015fmas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The deal settles claims brought by Ohio\u2019s Cuya hoga and Summit counties, which had accused the companies of fuelling a nationwide opioid crisis. Some 400,000 US overdose deaths between 1997 and 2017 were linked to opioids, ac cording to government data.<\/p>\n<p>The trial was to be a so-called bellwether, or test trial, that was meant to help shape a broader settlement of some 2,600 lawsuits pending over the toll opioids have taken on local communities and the nation.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Anla\u015fma, \u015firketleri \u00fclke \u00e7ap\u0131nda bir opioid krizini k\u00f6r\u00fcklemekle su\u00e7layan Ohio&#039;nun Cuya hoga ve Summit il\u00e7eleri taraf\u0131ndan getirilen iddialar\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcyor. 1997 aras\u0131nda yakla\u015f\u0131k 400.000 ABD a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 doz \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":240,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[57,75,98,253,254],"whitepaper-source":[277],"class_list":["post-2643","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-hunter-shkolnik","whitepaper_category-opioids-litigation","whitepaper_category-ohio-opioid-lawyers","whitepaper_category-opioid-crisis","whitepaper_category-opioid-epidemic","whitepaper-source-reuters"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2643"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}