{"id":6457,"date":"2017-12-01T20:45:23","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T01:45:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/verdicts\/2-4-billion-pharmaceutical-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T00:56:47","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T04:56:47","slug":"2-4-milyar-ilac-uzlastirma","status":"publish","type":"verdicts","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/hukumler\/2-4-milyar-ilac-uzlastirma\/","title":{"rendered":"$2,4 Milyar \u0130la\u00e7 Uzla\u015fmas\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Firma, uyu\u015fturucudan yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia eden yakla\u015f\u0131k 10.000 Actos\u00ae kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olan dava ekibinin bir par\u00e7as\u0131yd\u0131. Tip 2 \u015feker hastalar\u0131n\u0131n kan \u015fekerini kontrol etmelerine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmak i\u00e7in tasarlan\u0131p re\u00e7ete edilen Actos kullanan hastalara y\u00fcksek oranda mesane kanseri te\u015fhisi kondu. \u00c7e\u015fitli Davac\u0131lar lehine verilen birka\u00e7 karardan sonra, Takeda Pharmaceuticals ve ona ba\u011fl\u0131 \u015firketler, bu diyabet ilac\u0131n\u0131n 10.000 kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131yla bir anla\u015fmaya varmaya y\u00f6nlendirildi ve bunlar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131 Napoli Shkolnik hukuk grubu taraf\u0131ndan temsil ediliyordu. Sonu\u00e7 olarak Takeda, bu davalar\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6zmek i\u00e7in $2,4 milyar dolarl\u0131k bir anla\u015fma yapmay\u0131 kabul etti.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Firma, uyu\u015fturucudan yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia eden yakla\u015f\u0131k 10.000 Actos\u00ae kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olan dava ekibinin bir par\u00e7as\u0131yd\u0131. Tasarland\u0131 ve re\u00e7ete edildi\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","verdict_category":[758],"class_list":["post-6457","verdicts","type-verdicts","status-publish","hentry","verdict_category-pharmaceutical-litigation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/verdicts"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"verdict_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict_category?post=6457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}