{"id":7007,"date":"2017-04-19T19:07:31","date_gmt":"2017-04-19T23:07:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/uncategorized\/napoli-shkolnik-appear-united-states-supreme-court\/"},"modified":"2017-04-19T19:07:31","modified_gmt":"2017-04-19T23:07:31","slug":"napoli-shkolnik-gorunur-birlesik-devletler-yuksek-mahkemesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/article\/napoli-shkolnik-gorunur-birlesik-devletler-yuksek-mahkemesi\/","title":{"rendered":"Napoli Shkolnik, ABD Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi \u00d6n\u00fcne \u00c7\u0131kt\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

Duyulan mesele, Kaliforniya Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi'nin eyalet d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n Kaliforniya'da dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi karar\u0131na bir itirazd\u0131r.<\/h3>\n

\u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta, aralar\u0131nda Napoli Shkolnik'in temsilcilerinin de bulundu\u011fu Davac\u0131lar, Birle\u015fik Devletler Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi huzuruna \u00e7\u0131kacak. Mahkeme, Kaliforniya'n\u0131n en y\u00fcksek mahkemesinin, iddialar\u0131n ve yaralanmalar\u0131n benzer oldu\u011fu durumlarda, eyalet d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n Kaliforniya Eyalet Mahkemesi'nde bir ila\u00e7 \u015firketine dava a\u00e7mak i\u00e7in Kaliforniya sakinlerine kat\u0131labilecekleri \u015feklindeki hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc onaylayan karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 bir itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendirecek.<\/p>\n

Bu dava, uyu\u015fturucuyla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak yaralanan 33 eyaletten y\u00fczlerce ki\u015fi ad\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131lan davay\u0131 i\u00e7ermektedir. Plavix<\/a>\u00ae. San Francisco Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, Kaliforniya Eyaleti Temyiz Mahkemesi ve Kaliforniya Eyaleti Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, Davac\u0131lar\u0131n, \u015firketlerin \u00fcr\u00fcnlerinin neden oldu\u011fu zararlardan sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini do\u011frulad\u0131. Bristol-Myers Squibb \u015eirketi bu kararlara her f\u0131rsatta itiraz etti.<\/p>\n

Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri'ndeki milyonlarca insan, genellikle \u00f6l\u00fcmc\u00fcl bir sonucu olan kalp hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kalp yaralanmalar\u0131ndan muzdariptir. Gelecekte ba\u015fka bir kardiyak olay\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in, hastalara daha fazla kalp problemi riskini en aza indirgemek i\u00e7in uygun t\u0131bbi tedaviler re\u00e7ete edilir ve en yayg\u0131n re\u00e7ete edilen \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlerden biri de Plavix olarak bilinen bir ila\u00e7t\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk kez 1997'de FDA taraf\u0131ndan onayland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan beri Plavix, fel\u00e7 veya kalp krizi gibi kardiyovask\u00fcler sorun riski y\u00fcksek olan ki\u015filere d\u00fczenli olarak re\u00e7ete edildi. Bristol-Myers Squibb ilac\u0131 k\u0131sa s\u00fcrede piyasada en \u00e7ok satan ila\u00e7 haline geldi ve on y\u0131ll\u0131k pop\u00fclaritesinde yakla\u015f\u0131k $7 milyar sat\u0131\u015f yapt\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu davan\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131ndan bu yana, Davac\u0131lar, Kaliforniya ile temaslar\u0131n, b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00fclke \u00e7ap\u0131ndaki pazarlama ve tan\u0131t\u0131m kararlar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak belirli bir yarg\u0131 yetkisinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in eyalet d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki davac\u0131lar\u0131n iddialar\u0131yla yeterince "ili\u015fkili" oldu\u011funu ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde savundular.<\/p>\n

\u00c7e\u015fitli savunuculuk gruplar\u0131, k\u00e2r amac\u0131 g\u00fctmeyen kurulu\u015flar, kamu yarar\u0131na \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan gruplar ve e\u011fitimciler taraf\u0131ndan Davac\u0131lar\u0131 destekleyen \u00e7ok say\u0131da \u00f6zet dosyalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Napoli Shkolnik is looking forward to presenting Plaintiffs\u2019 position to the Justices along with appellate counsel Thomas Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell P.C. \u00a0Shayna E. Sacks<\/a>Firman\u0131n bir orta\u011f\u0131 olan , "Birle\u015fik Devletler Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesinin Kaliforniya Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi ile ayn\u0131 fikirde olaca\u011f\u0131na ve \u00fclke \u00e7ap\u0131ndaki yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 uygulamalar\u0131ndan ila\u00e7 end\u00fcstrisini ve di\u011fer b\u00fcy\u00fck \u015firketleri sorumlu tutmaya devam edece\u011finden emin oldu\u011funu" s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

\n

Ortak Marie Napoli<\/a> "Bu karar\u0131n etkisinin, kurumsal a\u00e7g\u00f6zl\u00fcl\u00fck ve n\u00fcfuza kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fccadelelerinde ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n haklar\u0131 \u00fczerinde geni\u015f kapsaml\u0131 etkileri olacakt\u0131r."<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

durum Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. - SC,<\/em> Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, No. 16-466. 2017 yaz\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flar\u0131nda bir karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n

\n

\u0130lgili Makaleler<\/strong><\/p>\n

New York Law Journal and The Recorder Front Pages Highlight Napoli Shkolnik Litigation<\/a><\/p>\n

Law360, Napoli Shkolnik Davas\u0131n\u0131 2016'n\u0131n En \u00d6nemli \u00dcr\u00fcn Sorumlulu\u011fu Davas\u0131 Olarak Kabul Etti<\/a><\/p>\n

Kaliforniya'n\u0131n En Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi: Eyalet D\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki Kurbanlar Kaliforniya'da Dava A\u00e7abilir<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dinlenen mesele, Kaliforniya Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesinin eyalet d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n Kaliforniya'da dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi karar\u0131na bir itirazd\u0131r. \u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki hafta, aralar\u0131nda Napoli Shkolnik'in temsilcilerinin de bulundu\u011fu Davac\u0131lar,\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7008,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[776],"tags":[858,859,865,875,885],"class_list":["post-7007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pharmaceutical-litigation","tag-hunter-shkolnik","tag-marie-napoli","tag-shayna-sacks","tag-bad-drugs","tag-plavix-lawsuit"],"acf":[],"page_builder_type":"gutenberg","gutenberg_data":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7007\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}