{"id":6784,"date":"2016-12-14T17:17:13","date_gmt":"2016-12-14T22:17:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/uncategorized\/law360-recognizes-napoli-shkolnik-litigation-top-product-liability-case-2016\/"},"modified":"2016-12-14T17:17:13","modified_gmt":"2016-12-14T22:17:13","slug":"law360-napoli-shkolnik-dava-en-urun-sorumluluk-durumu-2016yi-tanir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/article\/law360-napoli-shkolnik-dava-en-urun-sorumluluk-durumu-2016yi-tanir\/","title":{"rendered":"Napoli Shkolnik, En B\u00fcy\u00fck \u00dcr\u00fcn Sorumluluk Davas\u0131 \u0130\u00e7in Kaydedildi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/Product-Liability-Cases-To-Watch-In-2017-Law360.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Law360 Publishes Year-End Report: Recognizes Napoli Shkolnik  Litigation As One of the Top Product Liability Cases of 2016<\/a><br \/>\n<em>Law360, ge\u00e7en y\u0131l\u0131n en \u00f6nemli \u00fcr\u00fcn y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc karar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7iriyor. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Law360, Y\u0131l Sonu Raporunda 2016&#039;n\u0131n en \u00f6nemli \u00dcr\u00fcn Sorumlulu\u011fu Vakalar\u0131n\u0131n bir listesini derledi ve <em>Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. - Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme<\/em> ona<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the plaintiffs are represented by Napoli Shkolnik  partners <a href=\"\/tr\/napoli-attorney\/avci-shkolnik\/\">Avc\u0131 J. Shkolnik<\/a>, <a href=\"\/tr\/napoli-attorney\/shayna-cuvallar\/\">Shayna E. Sacks<\/a> ve <a href=\"\/tr\/napoli-attorney\/jennifer-liakos\/\">Jennifer R.Liakos<\/a>. Napoli Shkolnik ekibi, pazarlama ve da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m ile ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve geli\u015ftirme tesisleri de dahil olmak \u00fczere \u015firketin Kaliforniya&#039;daki ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, eyalet mahkemelerinin ikamet etmeyenlerin iddialar\u0131 \u00fczerinde \u00f6zel ki\u015fisel yarg\u0131 yetkisine sahip oldu\u011funu savundu.<\/p>\n<p>Kaliforniya Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi kabul etti ve eyalette dava a\u00e7an yakla\u015f\u0131k 600 Kaliforniyal\u0131 olmayana Bristol-Myers Squibb aleyhindeki davalar\u0131na devam etmeleri i\u00e7in ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yakt\u0131. Eyalet y\u00fcksek mahkemesi, ABD Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi&#039;nin 2014&#039;teki karar\u0131na ilk kez a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k verdi. <em>Daimler AG - Bauman<\/em>, genel yarg\u0131 yetkisinin bir \u015firketin &quot;evde&quot; oldu\u011fu durumlarda var oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n<p>BristolMyers dilek\u00e7esinde, Kaliforniya Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi&#039;nin yakla\u015f\u0131k 600 yerle\u015fik olmayan ki\u015finin ila\u00e7 \u015firketini eyaletin dostane yerinde dava etmesine izin veren b\u00f6l\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f karar\u0131n\u0131n, ABD&#039;deki davayla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 herhangi bir \u015feye de\u011fil, ila\u00e7 \u015firketinin eyaletteki gev\u015fek ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. el.<\/p>\n<p>BristolMyers, ila\u00e7 devinin devletle &quot;hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde temas\u0131&quot; olmasayd\u0131, bu iddialar\u0131n tamamen ayn\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. BristolMyers, \u015firketin Kaliforniya&#039;daki kan suland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 ilac\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan ilgisiz operasyonlar\u0131n\u0131n, Kaliforniya&#039;da ya\u015famayan insanlar\u0131n \u015firketi orada dava etmesine izin vermeye yetmeyece\u011fini savundu.<\/p>\n<p>Blackwell Burke PA&#039;dan Peter Goss, &quot;Yarg\u0131tay bu davay\u0131 al\u0131rsa, bu, \u00fcr\u00fcn y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc uygulay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 i\u00e7in y\u0131l\u0131n en \u00f6nemli kararlar\u0131ndan biri olacak&quot; dedi. \u201cMahkemenin dava turizmini anlaml\u0131 bir \u015fekilde ele almas\u0131 i\u00e7in ger\u00e7ek bir f\u0131rsat, e\u011fer kabul ederse. Herkes onu izleyecek.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Kaliforniya eyaleti y\u00fcksek mahkemesi, yay\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kendi karar\u0131nda, \u015firketin California ile - ilac\u0131n pazarlanmas\u0131 ve da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131 ve orada bulunan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve geli\u015ftirme tesisleri gibi - kapsaml\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, eyalet mahkemelerinin belirli ki\u015fisel yarg\u0131 yetkisine sahip oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi. yerle\u015fik olmayanlar\u0131n iddialar\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kaliforniya&#039;da ya\u015fayanlar ve yerle\u015fik olmayanlar taraf\u0131ndan pop\u00fcler kan suland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 ila\u00e7 Plavix nedeniyle dava ediliyor.<\/p>\n<p>Hunter, &quot;M\u00fc\u015fterilerimizi ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde temsil etmek her zaman \u00f6d\u00fcllendiricidir ve bu kararla, gelecekteki farmas\u00f6tik davalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde olumlu bir etkisi olacak bir davan\u0131n par\u00e7as\u0131 olmaktan gurur duyuyoruz&quot; diyor.<\/p>\n<p>Dava, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. - SC, California Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi, No. S221038&#039;dir.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Law360 Publishes Year-End Report: Recognizes Napoli Shkolnik Litigation As One of the Top Product Liability Cases of 2016 Law360 Reviews the most significant product liability ruling of the past year&#8230;.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6785,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[776],"tags":[820,858,865,866,875,885],"class_list":["post-6784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pharmaceutical-litigation","tag-product-liability","tag-hunter-shkolnik","tag-shayna-sacks","tag-jennifer-liakos","tag-bad-drugs","tag-plavix-lawsuit"],"acf":[],"page_builder_type":"gutenberg","gutenberg_data":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6784"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6784\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6785"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}