\u0130ki New York UBER s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc, UBER'in s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcler taraf\u0131ndan kazan\u0131lan bah\u015fi\u015fleri al\u0131koydu\u011fu ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclere ilgili maliyetleri geri \u00f6demekten ka\u00e7\u0131nmak i\u00e7in s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri yanl\u0131\u015f bir \u015fekilde ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z y\u00fckleniciler olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla UBER Technologies Inc. ve Raiser, LLC'ye (toplu olarak "UBER") kar\u015f\u0131 bir toplu dava a\u00e7t\u0131. UBER i\u00e7in s\u00fcr\u00fc\u015f.<\/p>\n
Kings County, New York Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi'nde bug\u00fcn yap\u0131lan \u015fikayet, New York Eyaletinde 2009'dan beri UBER i\u00e7in ara\u00e7 kullanan t\u00fcm s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri temsil etmeyi \u00f6neriyor. Davac\u0131lar, UBER'in kendilerine y\u00f6nelik bah\u015fi\u015fleri \u00f6demedi\u011fini ve s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta m\u00fc\u015fteriler taraf\u0131ndan sunulan bah\u015fi\u015fleri kabul etmesini yasaklad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ediyor.<\/p>\n
\u015eikayet, UBER m\u00fc\u015fterilerine sa\u011flanan ve onlara \u00fccretlerinin "dosyadaki [onlar\u0131n] kredi kartlar\u0131ndan otomatik olarak tahsil edildi\u011fini - bah\u015fi\u015f vermeye gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131" bildiren talimatlar\u0131 i\u00e7eriyor. Davac\u0131lar, UBER'in \u00fccretin m\u00fc\u015fteriler taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denen ve bah\u015fi\u015f olmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131koydu\u011funu iddia ediyor.<\/p>\n
Marie Napoli, "UBER, toplanan \u00fccretin herhangi bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 bah\u015fi\u015f olarak belirlemedi - New York UBER s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerini genellikle kazand\u0131klar\u0131 geleneksel 20% bah\u015fi\u015finden aldat\u0131yor."<\/p>\n
\u015eikayet ayr\u0131ca UBER'in s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri yanl\u0131\u015f bir \u015fekilde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar yerine ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z y\u00fckleniciler olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ediyor. Ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z y\u00fckleniciler olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131rma, UBER s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerini arabalar\u0131n\u0131, benzinlerini, sigortalar\u0131n\u0131 ve onar\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demek i\u00e7in kendi paralar\u0131n\u0131 kullanmaya zorlad\u0131. Bayan Napoli, "\u0130\u015fverenler, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denen i\u015fle ilgili masraflar\u0131 tazmin etmelidir - s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcleri ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z y\u00fckleniciler olarak s\u0131n\u0131fland\u0131rarak, UBER, UBER s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fclerinin masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamayarak New York yasalar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmi\u015ftir" diye ekledi Bayan Napoli.<\/p>\n
The law firms Napoli Law and Imbesi Law P.C. are jointly representing the New York plaintiffs. The firms have been contacted by hundreds of UBER drivers and plan to represent over 100,000 UBER drivers nationally, according to Vincent Imbesi, a partner of Imbesi Law P.C. \u201cSome drivers may be excluded from the class actions our firms will file in other States, but we will file as many individual arbitration claims necessary to recover money rightfully owed to individuals who drove for UBER,\u201d Mr. Imbesi added.<\/p>\n
Bay Imbesi, "Firmalar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n avukatlar\u0131, gerekti\u011finde 100.000 tahkim davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilecek mali g\u00fcce sahip ve \u00f6nceki kay\u0131tlar\u0131m\u0131z, ayn\u0131 anda binlerce ki\u015fiyi temsil etme ve tek bir olaydan kaynaklanan ma\u011fdurlar i\u00e7in y\u00fcz milyonlarca dolar\u0131 tazmin etme yetene\u011fimizi kan\u0131tl\u0131yor" dedi. yorum yapt\u0131<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u0130ki New York UBER s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc, UBER'in s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcler taraf\u0131ndan kazan\u0131lan bah\u015fi\u015fleri al\u0131koydu\u011fu ve yanl\u0131\u015f bir \u015fekilde\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6518,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[772],"tags":[859,887],"class_list":["post-6517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-litigation","tag-marie-napoli","tag-uber-lawsuit"],"acf":[],"page_builder_type":"gutenberg","gutenberg_data":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6517\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}