{"id":6502,"date":"2015-06-03T18:44:26","date_gmt":"2015-06-03T22:44:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/uncategorized\/the-realities-of-malpractice\/"},"modified":"2024-05-02T14:18:56","modified_gmt":"2024-05-02T18:18:56","slug":"malpraktis-gercekleri-gercekleri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/article\/malpraktis-gercekleri-gercekleri\/","title":{"rendered":"Malpraktisin Ger\u00e7ekleri"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Medical malpractice lawsuits can best be described as a cause of action arising from a healthcare provider\u2019s failure to treat a patient within the accepted standards of care. As a result, the patient must have suffered injury to have their day in court. When physicians act without regard to the generally accepted methods of treatment, they are said to have acted outside of the standard of care. This simply means that their chosen course of action in a given situation was not the standard that most other doctors would have lived up to. Sometimes a suit may result when a physician fails to run a routine test and fails to diagnose properly because of that. Other times a suit can result from a physician choosing to proceed with an operation that has a very high risk of resulting in injury. Whatever the situation, <a class=\"wpil_keyword_link\" href=\"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/uygulama-alanlari-2\/tibbi-uygulama-hatasi-hakkinda\/\"   title=\"t\u0131bbi uygulama hatas\u0131\" data-wpil-keyword-link=\"linked\">t\u0131bbi uygulama hatas\u0131<\/a> suits are a means of holding healthcare providers responsible for their negative effects on a patient\u2019s health.<\/p>\n<h3>New York&#039;ta Yolsuzlu\u011fu Kan\u0131tlamak<\/h3>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.health.ny.gov\/regulations\/education_law\/article\/131-a\/docs\/131a.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">t\u0131bbi uygulama hatas\u0131<\/a> dava, doktorun bak\u0131m standard\u0131na uygun olarak tedavi etmedi\u011finin kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Bunu yapmak i\u00e7in di\u011fer sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmeti sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131ndan uzman tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ihtiya\u00e7 vard\u0131r. Bunun maliyeti olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksek olabilir ve sadece bir uzman\u0131n t\u0131bbi kay\u0131tlar\u0131 incelemesini sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in saatte yakla\u015f\u0131k $300&#039;den ba\u015flar. Bir ifade al\u0131n\u0131rsa, maliyetler g\u00fcnl\u00fck $3.000&#039;e \u00e7ok yakla\u015facakt\u0131r. Bilirki\u015finin, davac\u0131-hastan\u0131nkine benzer bir durumda tam olarak hangi davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n bak\u0131m standard\u0131 kapsam\u0131na girece\u011fini belirlemesi ve ard\u0131ndan san\u0131k-doktorun standarda uymama \u015feklini a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 gerekecektir. New York&#039;ta bir t\u0131bbi uygulama hatas\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamak i\u00e7in ge\u00e7en ortalama s\u00fcre yakla\u015f\u0131k d\u00f6rt y\u0131ld\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3>New York&#039;ta Malpraktis Kazanmak<\/h3>\n<p>Bir davac\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131 \u00fcstlendikten ve yarg\u0131\u00e7 (yarg\u0131\u00e7 veya j\u00fcri) daval\u0131y\u0131 g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmaktan sorumlu bulduktan sonra, tazminat a\u015famas\u0131 ba\u015flar. Bir t\u0131bbi uygulama hatas\u0131 davac\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckmedebilece\u011fi iki t\u00fcr tazminat vard\u0131r. Birincisi tazmin edici zararlard\u0131r ve amac\u0131, davac\u0131y\u0131 doktorun yanl\u0131\u015f tedavisi ile makul \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ilgili olan masraflar\u0131 tazmin etmektir. Buna t\u0131bbi harcamalar, kaybedilen \u00fccretler, gelecekteki kazan\u00e7lar\u0131n kayb\u0131, ac\u0131 ve \u0131st\u0131rap, zevk kayb\u0131 ve bu hatlardaki di\u011fer zararlar dahildir. \u0130kinci kategori cezai tazminatlard\u0131r. Cezai zararlar, bir daval\u0131y\u0131 kas\u0131tl\u0131 olarak bir davac\u0131ya zarar vermekten veya bir hastay\u0131 pervas\u0131zca tedavi etmekten cezaland\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Cezai zararlar\u0131n pe\u015fine d\u00fc\u015fmek do\u011fal olarak daha zordur, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bunlar bir hastan\u0131n eylemlerinin kabul edilen bak\u0131m standard\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermek yerine doktorun motivasyonunun veya niyetinin kan\u0131t\u0131n\u0131 sunmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir.<\/p>\n<h3>T\u0131bbi Yanl\u0131\u015f Uygulama Avukatlar\u0131 Yard\u0131mc\u0131 Olabilir<\/h3>\n<p>Bir malpraktis davas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda, yasa iki amaca hizmet eder. \u0130lk olarak, yasa, malpraktis ma\u011fdurlar\u0131na yaralar\u0131 i\u00e7in tazminat alma hakk\u0131 vererek onlar\u0131 korur. \u0130kincisi, yasa, insanlar\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 y\u00f6neterek para kazananlar\u0131n kararlar\u0131ndan sorumlu tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar. Napoli Hukuk olarak, bu ilkeleri korumaya kesinlikle inan\u0131yoruz. \u0130hmalkar bir sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmeti sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n elinden zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fcyseniz, <a href=\"\/tr\/uygulama-alanlari-2\/kisisel-yaralanma\/\">temas etmek<\/a> ekibimiz bug\u00fcn \u00fccretsiz dan\u0131\u015fma i\u00e7in.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T\u0131bbi uygulama hatas\u0131 davalar\u0131, en iyi \u015fekilde, bir sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmeti sunucusunun bir hastay\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015f bak\u0131m standartlar\u0131 dahilinde tedavi etmemesinden kaynaklanan bir dava nedeni olarak tan\u0131mlanabilir. Olarak\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6503,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[780],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-medical-malpractice"],"acf":[],"page_builder_type":"gutenberg","gutenberg_data":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6502"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6502\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17653,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6502\/revisions\/17653"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}