{"id":2802,"date":"2021-03-19T16:47:14","date_gmt":"2021-03-19T20:47:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/law360-hunter-shkolnik-on-state-ags-and-purdue-ch-11-plan\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:41:46","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:41:46","slug":"law360-hunter-shkolnik-on-state-ags-and-purdue-ch-11-plan","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/biale-papiery\/law360-hunter-shkolnik-on-state-ags-and-purdue-ch-11-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"Law360: Hunter Shkolnik On State AGs i Purdue Ch. 11 Zaplanuj"},"content":{"rendered":"

However, the Sacklers are widely seen as the public face of the addiction crisis, and Hunter Shkolnik of Napoli Shkolnik PLLC, who represents local governments in litigation over the opioid crisis, told Law360 that he wasn’t surprised by the instant outcry from attorneys general.<\/p>\n

“There are some AGs that want a deal at all costs. There are other ones that want to extract a pound of flesh from the Sacklers,” Shkolnik said. “Should they be allowed to walk away with the little bit of money they’re paying? That’s the real issue that’s moving this.”<\/p>\n

Pobiera\u0107<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jednak Sacklerowie s\u0105 powszechnie postrzegani jako publiczna twarz kryzysu uzale\u017cnie\u0144, a Hunter Shkolnik z Napoli Shkolnik PLLC, kt\u00f3ry reprezentuje samorz\u0105dy lokalne w sporach s\u0105dowych dotycz\u0105cych opioid\u00f3w\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":92,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[75,253,254,368],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2802","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-opioids-litigation","whitepaper_category-opioid-crisis","whitepaper_category-opioid-epidemic","whitepaper_category-health-and-safety","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2802"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}