{"id":2610,"date":"2019-10-02T21:41:14","date_gmt":"2019-10-03T01:41:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/some-providers-may-proceed-cautiously-on-latest-legal-challe\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:32:29","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:32:29","slug":"some-providers-may-proceed-cautiously-on-latest-legal-challe","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/biale-papiery\/some-providers-may-proceed-cautiously-on-latest-legal-challe\/","title":{"rendered":"Niekt\u00f3rzy dostawcy mog\u0105 post\u0119powa\u0107 ostro\u017cnie w przypadku ostatniego wyzwania prawnego"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To those who might assume a federal lawsuit seeking class status for treatment providers wronged by insurance company actions would be receiving immediate and universal acclaim in the provider community, a little caution may be in order. While the latest lawsuit against United Behavioral Health (UBH) certainly will be interpreted by some addiction treatment providers as an opportunity to recover payments that were inappropriately denied (see ADAW, Sept. 23), the case also could launch a broader discussion of how best to guarantee that insured patients receive the care to which they are entitled.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dla tych, kt\u00f3rzy mogliby za\u0142o\u017cy\u0107 federalny pozew o status klasowy dla dostawc\u00f3w us\u0142ug leczenia skrzywdzonych przez dzia\u0142ania firmy ubezpieczeniowej, otrzymaliby natychmiastowe i powszechne uznanie w spo\u0142eczno\u015bci dostawc\u00f3w,\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":273,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[310],"whitepaper-source":[311],"class_list":["post-2610","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-matt-lavin","whitepaper-source-alcoholism-drug-abuse-weekly"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2610\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2610"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}