{"id":2584,"date":"2019-07-24T18:00:06","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T22:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/uber-class-action-settlement-update\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:30:55","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:30:55","slug":"uber-class-action-settlement-update","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/%e7%99%bd%e3%81%84%e7%b4%99\/uber-class-action-settlement-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber \u306e\u96c6\u56e3\u8a34\u8a1f\u306e\u548c\u89e3\u306b\u95a2\u3059\u308b\u6700\u65b0\u60c5\u5831"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A California federal judge has tentatively approved an increased $395,000 settlement in a class action alleging Uber denied drivers their fair share of riders&#8217; payments, saying the deal is still on the low end, but fair.<\/p>\n<p>The revamped deal made three notable changes, according to Judge Alsup. Each class member will receive at least $20 from the settlement, and any class members who were set to receive more than $20 based on their driving histories will still receive the same amount they were to get under the previous deal, according to the order.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, Dulberg\u2019s attorneys at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law360.com\/firms\/napoli-shkolnik\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u30ca\u30dd\u30ea\u30fb\u30b7\u30e5\u30b3\u30eb\u30cb\u30af PLLC<\/a>\u00a0agreed to cap their request for attorneys fees at 25% of the net settlement amount, down from the nearly 30% they had previously requested.<\/p>\n<p>Dulberg and the class are represented by Salvatore C. Badala of Napoli Shkolnik PLLC.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u30ab\u30ea\u30d5\u30a9\u30eb\u30cb\u30a2\u5dde\u306e\u9023\u90a6\u5224\u4e8b\u306f\u3001Uber \u304c\u4e57\u5ba2\u306e\u652f\u6255\u3044\u306e\u516c\u6b63\u306a\u5206\u914d\u3092\u30c9\u30e9\u30a4\u30d0\u30fc\u306b\u62d2\u5426\u3057\u305f\u3068\u4e3b\u5f35\u3059\u308b\u96c6\u56e3\u8a34\u8a1f\u3067\u3001$395,000 \u306e\u5897\u984d\u548c\u89e3\u3092\u66ab\u5b9a\u7684\u306b\u627f\u8a8d\u3057\u307e\u3057\u305f\u3002<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":297,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[287,61,64],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2584","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper_category-class-action","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2584"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}