{"id":2471,"date":"2018-05-01T18:00:55","date_gmt":"2018-05-01T22:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/wage-hour-class-actions-challenge-quest-diagnostics\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:27:01","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:27:01","slug":"%e8%b3%83%e9%87%91%e6%99%82%e9%96%93%e3%82%af%e3%83%a9%e3%82%b9-%e3%82%a2%e3%82%af%e3%82%b7%e3%83%a7%e3%83%b3-%e3%83%81%e3%83%a3%e3%83%ac%e3%83%b3%e3%82%b8-%e3%82%af%e3%82%a8%e3%82%b9%e3%83%88","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/%e7%99%bd%e3%81%84%e7%b4%99\/%e8%b3%83%e9%87%91%e6%99%82%e9%96%93%e3%82%af%e3%83%a9%e3%82%b9-%e3%82%a2%e3%82%af%e3%82%b7%e3%83%a7%e3%83%b3-%e3%83%81%e3%83%a3%e3%83%ac%e3%83%b3%e3%82%b8-%e3%82%af%e3%82%a8%e3%82%b9%e3%83%88\/","title":{"rendered":"\u8cc3\u91d1\u6642\u9593 \u30af\u30e9\u30b9 \u30a2\u30af\u30b7\u30e7\u30f3 \u30c1\u30e3\u30ec\u30f3\u30b8 \u30af\u30a8\u30b9\u30c8 \u8a3a\u65ad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mobile medical examiners for Quest Diagnostics were granted conditional certification of a nationwide collective action challenging the pay practices of the medical testing company. Finding that the affidavits of the medical examiners detailed similar experiences of being paid only per-appointment, but that they were required to perform considerable work to prepare for and close-out those appointments, a federal district court in New York concluded that the putative collective<br \/>\nmembers sufficiently alleged they were victims of a common policy ( Vecchio v. Quest Diagnostics Inc., April 30, 2018, Ramos, E.).<\/p>\n<p>Counsel for the plaintiff, observed that this ruling is significant because it allows medical examiners across the country\u2014including both independent contractors and employees\u2014to band together to challenge Quest&#8217;s employment practices.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quest Diagnostics \u306e\u79fb\u52d5\u691c\u6b7b\u5b98\u306f\u3001\u533b\u7642\u691c\u67fb\u4f1a\u793e\u306e\u7d66\u4e0e\u6163\u884c\u306b\u7570\u8b70\u3092\u5531\u3048\u308b\u5168\u56fd\u898f\u6a21\u306e\u96c6\u56e3\u884c\u52d5\u306e\u6761\u4ef6\u4ed8\u304d\u8a8d\u5b9a\u3092\u53d7\u3051\u307e\u3057\u305f\u3002 \u2026\u306e\u5ba3\u8a93\u4f9b\u8ff0\u66f8\u3092\u767a\u898b<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":412,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[71,186],"whitepaper-source":[232],"class_list":["post-2471","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-quest-diagnostics","whitepaper_category-labor-law","whitepaper-source-westlaw-thomson-reuters"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2471\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2471"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}