{"id":2730,"date":"2020-06-08T18:39:02","date_gmt":"2020-06-08T22:39:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/viant-cigna-want-out-of-behavioral-healthcare-class-action\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:39:23","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:39:23","slug":"viant-cigna-want-out-of-behavioral-healthcare-class-action","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/papiers-blanc\/viant-cigna-want-out-of-behavioral-healthcare-class-action\/","title":{"rendered":"Viant et Cigna veulent sortir du recours collectif en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 comportementale"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The lawsuits center on claims that CBH and United Behavioral Health worked with fellow defendant Viant to short payments for claims related to substance use and mental health treatment. A group of patients brought two of the suits, while a group of behavioral health providers launched the other two.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Les poursuites portent sur des all\u00e9gations selon lesquelles CBH et United Behavioral Health ont travaill\u00e9 avec un autre d\u00e9fendeur Viant pour court-circuiter les paiements pour les r\u00e9clamations li\u00e9es \u00e0 la consommation de substances et au traitement de la sant\u00e9 mentale. UN\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":159,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[61,293,298,303,304,309,368],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2730","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-class-action","whitepaper_category-healthcare","whitepaper_category-insurance","whitepaper_category-erisa","whitepaper_category-parity","whitepaper_category-insurance-claims","whitepaper_category-health-and-safety","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2730\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2730"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}