{"id":2611,"date":"2019-10-02T21:44:08","date_gmt":"2019-10-03T01:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/new-lawsuit-over-ubhs-guidelines-could-yield-windfall-for\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:32:31","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:32:31","slug":"new-lawsuit-over-ubhs-guidelines-could-yield-windfall-for","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/papiers-blanc\/new-lawsuit-over-ubhs-guidelines-could-yield-windfall-for\/","title":{"rendered":"Un nouveau proc\u00e8s sur les directives de l&#039;UBH pourrait rapporter une aubaine pour"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following a court ruling earlier this year against United Behavioral Health&#8217;s (UBH&#8217;s) former level\u2010of\u2010care and coverage determination guidelines (see ADAW, Aug. 5), the managed behavioral health insurance giant now faces an action that is potentially much more far\u2010reaching \u2014 and this time, directly beneficial to substance use and mental health treatment providers.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Suite \u00e0 une d\u00e9cision de justice rendue plus t\u00f4t cette ann\u00e9e contre les anciennes directives de d\u00e9termination du niveau de soins et de la couverture de United Behavioral Health (UBH) (voir ADAW, 5 ao\u00fbt), le g\u00e9ant de l&#039;assurance maladie comportementale g\u00e9r\u00e9e est d\u00e9sormais confront\u00e9 \u00e0\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":272,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[310],"whitepaper-source":[311],"class_list":["post-2611","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-matt-lavin","whitepaper-source-alcoholism-drug-abuse-weekly"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2611"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}