{"id":2592,"date":"2019-08-02T19:31:58","date_gmt":"2019-08-02T23:31:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-lawsuit-over-provider-payments\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:31:17","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:31:17","slug":"bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-lawsuit-over-provider-payments","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/papiers-blanc\/bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-lawsuit-over-provider-payments\/","title":{"rendered":"BCBS of MI Hit with $40M poursuite sur les paiements des fournisseurs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan faces a lawsuit filed on behalf of mental health and substance abuse<br \/>\ntreatment providers that accused the insurer of underpaying claims.<\/p>\n<p>New York City-based law firm Napoli Shkolnik filed the lawsuit on behalf of four substance abuse treatment<br \/>\ncenters in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The lawsuit argues BCBS of<br \/>\nMichigan failed to properly pay for substance abuse treatment and other care for behavioral health disorders.<br \/>\nThe plaintiffs claimed BCBS of Michigan underpaid claims for 4,000 patients, and seeks more than $40 million.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield du Michigan fait face \u00e0 une action en justice intent\u00e9e au nom de prestataires de traitement de la sant\u00e9 mentale et de la toxicomanie qui ont accus\u00e9 l&#039;assureur de sous-payer les r\u00e9clamations. Bas\u00e9 \u00e0 New York\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":291,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[287,293],"whitepaper-source":[296],"class_list":["post-2592","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper_category-healthcare","whitepaper-source-beckers-hospital-review"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2592\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2592"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}