{"id":2574,"date":"2019-06-17T18:19:20","date_gmt":"2019-06-17T22:19:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/seneca-county-ny-joins-telecommunications-lawsuit\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:30:30","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:30:30","slug":"seneca-county-ny-joins-telecommunications-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/papiers-blanc\/seneca-county-ny-joins-telecommunications-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Le comt\u00e9 de Seneca (NY) rejoint le proc\u00e8s des t\u00e9l\u00e9communications"},"content":{"rendered":"

Seneca County decided to join several others in a lawsuit against telephone and telecommunications companies for allegedly not remitting the 911 surcharges, as required, to help counties pay for local 911 services. The counties will use the law firm of Napoli Shkolnik to pursue the litigation.<\/p>\n

Partner Danielle Marlow is leading the fight in the 911 surcharge litigation. Cities, Counties and Municipalities may have the potential to recover significant compensation. En savoir plus<\/a> about claims and the available legal options.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le comt\u00e9 de Seneca a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de se joindre \u00e0 plusieurs autres dans une poursuite contre les entreprises de t\u00e9l\u00e9phone et de t\u00e9l\u00e9communications pour ne pas avoir pr\u00e9tendument vers\u00e9 les surtaxes du 911, comme requis, pour aider les comt\u00e9s \u00e0 payer les frais locaux\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":306,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[286],"whitepaper-source":[288],"class_list":["post-2574","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-911-surcharge","whitepaper-source-finger-lakes-times"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2574\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2574"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}