{"id":2481,"date":"2018-06-07T18:55:39","date_gmt":"2018-06-07T22:55:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:27:22","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:27:22","slug":"2nd-circuit-ranime-9-11-workers-suit","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/papiers-blanc\/2nd-circuit-ranime-9-11-workers-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"Le 2e circuit fait revivre le costume des travailleurs du 11 septembre"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A long-running legal battle between workers who say they became sick as a result of working in Lower Manhattan after the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks and the Battery Park City Authority was revived by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>Napoli Shkolnik of counsel <a href=\"\/fr\/napoli-attorney\/paul-napoli\/\">Paul Naples<\/a>, who represented a portion of the appellants, said the BPCA had \u201cused every legal maneuver possible to avoid paying these claims,\u201d and this result was not unforeseen given the Court of Appeals\u2019 answer to the circuit\u2019s certified questions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re happy that finally these plaintiffs might finally have their time in court in front of Judge Hellerstein,\u201d Napoli said.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Une bataille juridique de longue date entre des travailleurs qui disent \u00eatre tomb\u00e9s malades apr\u00e8s avoir travaill\u00e9 dans le Lower Manhattan apr\u00e8s les attentats terroristes du 11 septembre et Battery Park City\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":401,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[59,69],"whitepaper-source":[79],"class_list":["post-2481","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-paul-napoli","whitepaper_category-world-trade-center","whitepaper-source-new-york-law-journal"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2481\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2481"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}