{"id":2432,"date":"2018-03-26T20:49:48","date_gmt":"2018-03-27T00:49:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/uber-driver-alleges-uber-boost-services-fees-illegal\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:25:41","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:25:41","slug":"uber-driver-allegue-uber-boost-services-frais-illegaux","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/papiers-blanc\/uber-driver-allegue-uber-boost-services-frais-illegaux\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Driver all\u00e8gue que les frais de services Uber Boost sont ill\u00e9gaux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A North Carolina man and Uber driver alleges the ride-hailing company unlawfully takes a service fee charge out of Boost and Surge calculations.<\/p>\n<p>Martin Dulberg, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a complaint on March 14 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of<br \/>\nCalifornia against Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier LLC alleging breach of contract.<\/p>\n<p>According to the complaint, the plaintiff drives for Uber using both its Uber X and Uber Select platforms. During times of increased demand, the suit states<br \/>\nthat a separate charge known as Surge is applied or a multiplier known as Boost.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Un homme de Caroline du Nord et chauffeur Uber all\u00e8gue que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de covoiturage pr\u00e9l\u00e8ve ill\u00e9galement des frais de service sur les calculs Boost et Surge. Martin Dulberg, individuellement et au nom de\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":446,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[64],"whitepaper-source":[142],"class_list":["post-2432","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper-source-legal-newsline"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2432","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2432\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2432"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}