{"id":6462,"date":"2018-04-18T19:32:33","date_gmt":"2018-04-18T23:32:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/verdicts\/60000-personal-injury-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T00:56:47","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T04:56:47","slug":"60000-prejudice-personnel-reglement","status":"publish","type":"verdicts","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/verdicts\/60000-prejudice-personnel-reglement\/","title":{"rendered":"$60,000 R\u00e8glement des pr\u00e9judices corporels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le demandeur, un \u00e9lectricien syndiqu\u00e9, est tomb\u00e9 sur un chantier alors qu&#039;il travaillait avec une \u00e9quipe pour tirer le c\u00e2blage \u00e0 travers un conduit m\u00e9tallique avec une corde d\u00e9chir\u00e9e et effiloch\u00e9e qui s&#039;est cass\u00e9e. Le demandeur s&#039;\u00e9tait plaint du fait que la corde n&#039;\u00e9tait pas s\u00fbre, mais aucune corde de remplacement n&#039;a \u00e9t\u00e9 fournie, et aucun \u00ab tire-fil \u00bb disponible n&#039;a \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9. Le demandeur a subi des blessures au cou et au dos qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 trait\u00e9es de mani\u00e8re conservatrice sans avoir besoin d&#039;une intervention chirurgicale. Un r\u00e8glement a \u00e9t\u00e9 obtenu par des n\u00e9gociations directes avec l&#039;entrepreneur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral alors qu&#039;une requ\u00eate en rejet\/jugement sommaire \u00e9tait pendante. Nous avons \u00e9galement pu obtenir une r\u00e9duction du privil\u00e8ge d&#039;indemnisation des accidents du travail.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff, a union electrician, fell on a job-site while working with a crew to pull wiring through a metal conduit with a torn and frayed rope which broke. Plaintiff had&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","verdict_category":[757],"class_list":["post-6462","verdicts","type-verdicts","status-publish","hentry","verdict_category-personal-injury"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/verdicts"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"verdict_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict_category?post=6462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}