{"id":6461,"date":"2018-04-18T19:31:09","date_gmt":"2018-04-18T23:31:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/verdicts\/135000-personal-injury-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T00:56:47","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T04:56:47","slug":"135000-prejudice-personnel-reglement","status":"publish","type":"verdicts","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/verdicts\/135000-prejudice-personnel-reglement\/","title":{"rendered":"$135,000 R\u00e8glement des pr\u00e9judices corporels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le demandeur \u00e9tait un menuisier syndiqu\u00e9 qui avait tr\u00e9buch\u00e9 sur un morceau de rail m\u00e9tallique laiss\u00e9 par un autre corps de m\u00e9tier sur les marches menant au sous-sol d&#039;un immeuble en construction. Le demandeur se dirigeait vers le sous-sol pour obtenir des mat\u00e9riaux pour le travail qu&#039;il faisait. Le demandeur a subi une grave entorse de la cheville droite qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 trait\u00e9e de mani\u00e8re conservatrice et n&#039;a pas n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de chirurgie. Malgr\u00e9 la d\u00e9couverte d&#039;une blessure permanente, le demandeur a repris ses fonctions compl\u00e8tes apr\u00e8s seulement trois mois et a continu\u00e9 \u00e0 travailler depuis lors. Un r\u00e8glement tr\u00e8s avantageux a \u00e9t\u00e9 obtenu lors d&#039;une m\u00e9diation directement avec l&#039;entrepreneur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des travaux. Une r\u00e9duction du montant du privil\u00e8ge d&#039;indemnisation des accidents du travail a \u00e9galement \u00e9t\u00e9 obtenue.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Plaintiff was a union carpenter who tripped over a loose piece of metal track left by another trade on steps leading to the basement of a building under construction. Plaintiff&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","verdict_category":[757],"class_list":["post-6461","verdicts","type-verdicts","status-publish","hentry","verdict_category-personal-injury"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/verdicts"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6461\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"verdict_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict_category?post=6461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}