{"id":6395,"date":"2016-03-06T16:01:37","date_gmt":"2016-03-06T21:01:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/verdicts\/30-75-million-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T00:56:41","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T04:56:41","slug":"30-75-million-reglement","status":"publish","type":"verdicts","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/verdicts\/30-75-million-reglement\/","title":{"rendered":"$30,75 millions de r\u00e8glement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Pour une classe de plus de 4500 d\u00e9tenteurs d&#039;int\u00e9r\u00eats de redevances de l&#039;Oklahoma contre plusieurs grandes compagnies p\u00e9troli\u00e8res du Midwest pour leur d\u00e9duction non autoris\u00e9e des paiements de redevances dus aux demandeurs de redevances. Ces demandeurs faisaient confiance \u00e0 ces compagnies p\u00e9troli\u00e8res pour verser des dividendes sur ces redevances, mais cette confiance \u00e9tait mal plac\u00e9e et l&#039;argent n&#039;\u00e9tait pas distribu\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re \u00e9gale ou \u00e9quitable aux yeux de la loi.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pour une classe de plus de 4500 d\u00e9tenteurs d&#039;int\u00e9r\u00eats de redevances de l&#039;Oklahoma contre plusieurs grandes compagnies p\u00e9troli\u00e8res du Midwest pour leur d\u00e9duction non autoris\u00e9e des paiements de redevances dus aux demandeurs de redevances.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":6396,"menu_order":0,"template":"","verdict_category":[762],"class_list":["post-6395","verdicts","type-verdicts","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","verdict_category-business-litigation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/verdicts"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6395\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"verdict_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict_category?post=6395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}