La loi sur la responsabilit\u00e9 du fait des produits r\u00e9git la responsabilit\u00e9 de toute partie impliqu\u00e9e dans la fabrication et la vente d'un produit en cas de blessures et de dommages. La loi sur la responsabilit\u00e9 du fait des produits de chaque \u00c9tat d\u00e9termine qui est responsable des blessures ou des dommages mat\u00e9riels caus\u00e9s par un produit d\u00e9fectueux, tels que\u00a0:<\/p>\n
Alors que de nombreux \u00c9tats ont adopt\u00e9 la Mod\u00e8le de loi uniforme sur la responsabilit\u00e9 des produits du D\u00e9partement du commerce des \u00c9tats-Unis<\/a> (MUPLA), there is no federal product liability law. The law of products liability lies mainly in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and through judicial decisions in other product liability cases, called common law, and not through law enacted by a legislative body.<\/p>\n In all product liability cases, the products liability lawyers representing the injured person must prove that it is a defective product due to a design defect, manufacturing defect or marketing defect. Design defects are inherent design flaws that cause the product to be dangerous even when the consumer uses the product as intended.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Manufacturing defects are defects that occur during the product\u2019s manufacturing or production process, which make the products more dangerous to use than expected. Marketing defects involve improper of insufficient instruction of safe product use and lack of or inadequate safety labels or warnings that fail to notify the consumer of latent dangers of the product.<\/p>\n Because product liability law varies by state, including whether the basis of the product liability is strict liability, n\u00e9gligence<\/a> ou rupture de garantie, toute personne qui subit des blessures, mort injustifi\u00e9e<\/a> d'un \u00eatre cher, ou les dommages mat\u00e9riels caus\u00e9s par un produit d\u00e9fectueux doivent consulter les avocats exp\u00e9riment\u00e9s en responsabilit\u00e9 des produits de blessure personnelle<\/a> law firm Napoli Shkolnik PLLC.<\/p>\n The most common basis of product liability cases is strict liability. Strict liability is a legal principal that only requires products liability lawyers representing the injured person to prove it is a defective product. If the product caused injury, the designer, manufacturer and\/or supplier is liable regardless if they took great care or engaged in misconduct.<\/p>\n Products liability lawyers representing the injured person can also file a case of products liability on a basis of negligence. In this type of products liability claim, not only must products liability lawyers prove it is a defective product, but also that the product\u2019s manufacturers or other parties failed in their duty to the customer by not taking reasonable care in the design, manufacture or inspection process to prevent the injury of the consumer during foreseeable product use.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Breach of warranty can also be the basis of a products liability claim. In a breach of warranty theory, products liability lawyers are required to prove one of three types of breach of warranty. The first is breach of the manufacturer or seller\u2019s express warranty, which is a specific promise or guarantee made in writing, verbally or otherwise from the manufacturer or seller to the consumer about the specifications or condition of the product. The second is breach of implied warranty of merchantability. This is the unwritten or unspoken guarantee from the manufacturer that a product conforms to ordinary standards of care.<\/p>\n Third is breach of the implied warranty of fitness. This means that if the manufacturer or seller knew of the consumer\u2019s non-ordinary purpose for the product and implied a fitness of the product for that non-ordinary purpose when there was not, knowing the consumer was relying on the manufacturers or seller\u2019s knowledge, it would be a breach of implied warranty of fitness.<\/p>\nles avocats en responsabilit\u00e9 du fait des produits aident \u00e0 naviguer dans les r\u00e9clamations en responsabilit\u00e9 du fait des produits<\/h3>\n
Fondement des r\u00e9clamations<\/h3>\n