{"id":5667,"date":"2017-03-28T20:07:43","date_gmt":"2017-03-29T00:07:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/practiceareas\/invokana\/"},"modified":"2022-06-21T16:54:04","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T20:54:04","slug":"invokana","status":"publish","type":"practiceareas","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/domaines-de-pratique-2\/invokana\/","title":{"rendered":"New York Invokana Attorneys"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"update-highlight\" style=\"text-align: center; background-color: red;\">NOUS N&#039;ACCEPTONS PLUS LES CAS INVOKANA<\/h2>\n<p>L&#039;histoire derri\u00e8re Invokana est tr\u00e8s similaire \u00e0 Januvia, Accutane, Byetta et d&#039;autres <a href=\"\/fr\/domaines-de-pratique-2\/contentieux-pharmaceutique\/droits-drogues-dangereuses\/\">drogues dangereuses<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Millions of Americans suffer from Type 2 Diabetes. As the disease spread in the early 2000s, anti-diabetes drugs were at a premium. So, when Invokana (Canagliflozin) became available in 2013, many people hailed it as a miracle drug. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Johnson &amp; Johnson division, aggressively marketed Invokana as a cutting-edge way to control diabetes and lose weight. Before long, the company had sold billions of dollars worth of Invokana worldwide.<\/p>\n<p>But along the way, it appears that the company took dangerous shortcuts. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration warned of possible serious complications, including diabetic ketoacidosis, bone fractures, and urinary tract infections. Later warnings included possible amputations and, in August 2018, Fournier\u2019s Gangrene. As a result, Invokana sales have tumbled almost 30 percent, and Janssen faces some 1,100 liability lawsuits.<\/p>\n<p>These lawsuits seek compensation for actual losses, as well as punitive damages. The complex legal and factual issues involved demand highly-experienced representation. The professional team at <a href=\"\/fr\/\">Loi de Naples<\/a> a les pouvoirs pour g\u00e9rer ces cas. Nous repr\u00e9sentons les victimes de drogues dangereuses \u00e0 l&#039;\u00e9chelle nationale, nous avons donc les ressources dont ces cas ont besoin. Plus important encore, les grandes soci\u00e9t\u00e9s pharmaceutiques n&#039;effraient pas Paul J. Napoli et ses coll\u00e8gues. Ils ne reculeront pas. Au lieu de cela, ils se battront jusqu&#039;au bout pour obtenir la compensation et la justice que vous m\u00e9ritez.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Invokana est-il une drogue dangereuse ?<\/h2>\n<p>Doctors were excited about Invokana because it inhibited subtype 2 sodium-glucose transport proteins. After several years of success in Europe, Canagliflozin was the first FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitor.<\/p>\n<p>SGLT2 proteins reabsorb about 90 percent of the body\u2019s glucose. Invokana blocks these transporters, enabling patients to pass over 100 grams of blood sugar per day through their urine. That means the excess blood sugar never enters the kidneys.<\/p>\n<p>As a bonus, SGLT2 inhibitors, a class which also includes Xigduo XR, Qtern, Jardiance, Glyxambi, Synjardy, Invokamet, Invokamet XR, Farxiga, Synjardy XR, Steglatro, Segluromet and Steglujan, carry a very low risk of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar).<\/p>\n<p>Issues with the drug approval system magnified problems with the drug itself. It costs an average of $2.5 billion just to bring a new drug to market. At the same time, Congress has slashed the length of drug patents. So, companies like Janssen must sell a lot of product in a short amount of time to show a healthy profit. They aggressively market these drugs and sometimes bury negative information.<\/p>\n<p>Les <a href=\"\/fr\/domaines-de-pratique-2\/contentieux-pharmaceutique\/infuse-greffe-osseuse\/\">Infuser une greffe osseuse<\/a> is a good example of an aggressive marketing campaign that went off the rails. To boost sales, Medtronic encouraged doctors to use the drug in experimental ways. The company sponsored lavish retreats for doctors and may have even falsified safety information.<\/p>\n<p>As for Invokana, Janssen was not able to bury negative information for long. It soon came to light, but not before this dangerous drug seriously injured thousands of patients.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Effets secondaires d&#039;Invokana, premier tour<\/h2>\n<p>At the onset, Janssen acknowledged that Canagliflozin was risky. However, the company insisted that side effects were generally mild to moderate. They included things like thirst, high cholesterol levels, low blood pressure, and increased urination.<\/p>\n<p>But the company did not tell patients the whole story. It put profits before people. In 2015, the FDA issued warnings for:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Acidoc\u00e9tose diab\u00e9tique<\/strong>: Invokana ne fait rien pour corriger les d\u00e9s\u00e9quilibres d&#039;insuline dans le corps. Lorsque la production d&#039;insuline est faible, le corps produit des c\u00e9tones tr\u00e8s acides, conduisant \u00e0 l&#039;ACD. Cette maladie provoque souvent un gonflement du cerveau, ainsi que des taux de potassium et de sucre dans le sang dangereusement bas. Selon la FDA, l&#039;ACD induite par Invokana n\u00e9cessite assez souvent de longs s\u00e9jours \u00e0 l&#039;h\u00f4pital et est parfois mortelle.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fractures osseuses\u00a0:<\/strong> De nombreux m\u00e9dicaments antidiab\u00e9tiques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 associ\u00e9s \u00e0 l&#039;ost\u00e9oporose et \u00e0 la faiblesse des os. En ce qui concerne Invokana, ce lien \u00e9tait encore plus fort. Malgr\u00e9 ces preuves, la FDA a approuv\u00e9 Invokana. Deux ans plus tard, il a ordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 Janssen de mettre \u00e0 jour l&#039;\u00e9tiquette et d&#039;inclure le risque de fractures graves.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Parmi les autres modifications apport\u00e9es en 2015, citons un avertissement am\u00e9lior\u00e9 concernant les infections des voies urinaires. Il semble que le risque d&#039;infection urinaire \u00e9tait beaucoup plus important et beaucoup plus grave que Janssen a d&#039;abord reconnu.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Effets secondaires d&#039;Invokana, tour 2<\/h2>\n<p>The FDA hardly ever recalls drugs. Recalls put the agency in a very bad position. No one, including bureaucrats at the FDA, likes to admit that they made mistakes. So, Janssen continued to sell Invokana and continued to insist that the drug was safe.<\/p>\n<p>This denial and stay-the-course strategy worked, at least for a while. But shortly thereafter, in 2017 and 2018, new and even more sinister dangers became apparent, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Amputation:<\/strong> Le diab\u00e8te est l&#039;une des principales causes d&#039;amputation aux \u00c9tats-Unis, en particulier dans les membres inf\u00e9rieurs. Certains m\u00e9decins pensent que les inhibiteurs du SGLT2 provoquent une accumulation de sang dans les pieds et les orteils. Cela augmente consid\u00e9rablement le risque d&#039;amputation. Ce risque est particuli\u00e8rement inqui\u00e9tant car Invokana est cens\u00e9 att\u00e9nuer les effets du diab\u00e8te au lieu de les aggraver.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Gangr\u00e8ne de Fournier :<\/strong> Lorsque Invokana est arriv\u00e9 sur les \u00e9tag\u00e8res pour la premi\u00e8re fois, Janssen a admis le risque d&#039;infections g\u00e9nitales bact\u00e9riennes. Mais le risque r\u00e9el est beaucoup plus \u00e9lev\u00e9 que ce que l&#039;entreprise a admis. La fasciite n\u00e9crosante commence g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement dans le p\u00e9rin\u00e9e (zone situ\u00e9e entre les organes g\u00e9nitaux et l&#039;anus) \u00e0 cause d&#039;une coupure. Elle est presque toujours extr\u00eamement grave ou mortelle. Avant Invokana, trente ans de m\u00e9dicaments antidiab\u00e9tiques ont produit six de ces cas. Apr\u00e8s avoir utilis\u00e9 Invokana pendant seulement trois mois, douze personnes ont d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 la gangr\u00e8ne de Fournier. Tous ont n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 une hospitalisation de longue dur\u00e9e en urgence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Legally, victims have two basic options to get the compensation they deserve.<\/p>\n<p>Manufacturers are strictly liable for damages if the products they sell are unsafe. Victims in these cases need only prove cause. If there is a link between Invokana and your serious illness, Janssen may be legally responsible.<\/p>\n<p>Negligence is another common theory. It is all too obvious that Janssen knew about Invokana\u2019s risks yet sold the drug anyway. Such behavior clearly demonstrates a lack of care. In New York, all pharmaceutical negligence and strict liability cases are a bit easier to win. New York courts have victim-friendly rules on expert witnesses and other procedural matters.<\/p>\n<p>Invokana causes serious side effects and Janssen knew about them before it began selling this dangerous drug. For a free consultation with an <a href=\"\/fr\/nous-contacter\/\">avocat exp\u00e9riment\u00e9 en dommages corporels \u00e0 New York<\/a>, contactez Napoli Shkolnik LLC. Les avocats peuvent mettre les victimes en contact avec des m\u00e9decins, m\u00eame si elles n&#039;ont ni argent ni assurance.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WE ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTING INVOKANA CASES The story behind Invokana is very similar to Januvia, Accutane, Byetta, and other dangerous drugs. Millions of Americans suffer from Type 2 Diabetes&#8230;.<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":203,"template":"","practiceareas_category":[743],"class_list":["post-5667","practiceareas","type-practiceareas","status-publish","hentry","practiceareas_category-pharmaceutical-litigation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas\/5667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/practiceareas"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas\/5667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"practiceareas_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas_category?post=5667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}