Airplane mechanics are much more than just women and men with wrenches. These individuals are highly-trained, and highly-paid, professionals with a high degree of skill in a number of areas. For example, General Aviation mechanics must work on everything from single-seat propeller aircraft to sophisticated jets that carry more than a dozen passengers. Specifically, airplane mechanics must repair current problems and predict future failures.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, mechanically-related cas d'accident d'avion<\/a> present some intricate legal issues. It is not easy to determine fault and establish liability. The mechanic can also raise a number of effective defenses in these proceedings.<\/p>\n Given all these complexities, you need an effective lawyer to stand up for your rights in the event of an aviation crash. At Loi de Naples<\/a>, nos avocats sp\u00e9cialistes des accidents d'aviation sont des professionnels tr\u00e8s exp\u00e9riment\u00e9s et d\u00e9vou\u00e9s. Ils ont les outils dont ils ont besoin pour monter un dossier gagnant. Peut-\u00eatre plus important encore, ils ont la passion de mener l'affaire jusqu'au bout. Cette combinaison produit souvent des r\u00e9sultats qui d\u00e9passent vos attentes.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In many ways, airplane mechanics have almost a fiduciary duty towards airplane owners and passengers. Like a stock broker, a mechanic has almost unlimited access to a very personal asset. Like a lawyer, a mechanic is the only person between the aircraft owner and a potential tragedy. And like a doctor, an airplane owner is entirely dependent on the mechanic to keep the aircraft safe.<\/p>\n As a result, the standard of care is much higher in these cases than it is in car crashes. The Code of Federal Regulations sets out an airplane mechanic\u2019s high duty in this realm. That duty includes:<\/p>\n Ces normes de la FAA ne sont que le minimum. L\u00e9galement, les m\u00e9caniciens et autres professionnels doivent respecter ou d\u00e9passer la norme de l'industrie. Selon la zone g\u00e9ographique, le type d'a\u00e9ronef et d'autres facteurs, la norme de l'industrie pourrait \u00eatre beaucoup plus \u00e9lev\u00e9e.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Une fois qu'un avocat a \u00e9tabli la norme de diligence appropri\u00e9e, le vrai travail commence. Les victimes\/plaignants ont la charge de la preuve dans ce domaine. Ainsi, en plus de l'obligation l\u00e9gale, ils doivent \u00e9tablir :<\/p>\n Les moyens de d\u00e9fense courants dans les cas de maintenance inappropri\u00e9e des a\u00e9ronefs et d'autres cas de n\u00e9gligence comprennent la n\u00e9gligence contributive et la prise en charge du risque. La n\u00e9gligence contributive est essentiellement un moyen de rejeter la responsabilit\u00e9 de l'accident sur la victime. Ces r\u00e9clamations comprennent souvent des all\u00e9gations de erreur du pilote<\/a>.<\/p>\n Assumption of the risk is a similar doctrine. But there is a big difference between getting into a plane, which has a theoretical risk of crashing, and getting into a plane which the person knows to be unreasonably dangerous.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Once fault is established, the battle is not over yet. At Napoli Law, we are committed to both justice and compensation in these cases. Compensation is sometimes hard to obtain. The FAA usually does not require mechanics to carry insurance.<\/p>\n So, vicarious liability is often important in these claims. Third party liability gives a victim\/plaintiff an additional source of compensation. Some common theories include:<\/p>\n New York and most other states are modified joint and several liability states. If there are multiple tortfeasors, the judge usually apportions damages among them based on their percentage of fault.<\/p>\nObligation dans les cas d'entretien incorrect<\/h2>\n
\n
\u00c9tablir la n\u00e9gligence dans les cas d'entretien inappropri\u00e9<\/h2>\n
\n
Probl\u00e8mes de responsabilit\u00e9<\/h2>\n
\n