{"id":5600,"date":"2015-11-11T20:46:10","date_gmt":"2015-11-12T01:46:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/practiceareas\/contracts-violations-disputes\/"},"modified":"2022-06-21T16:53:49","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T20:53:49","slug":"contrats-violations-litiges","status":"publish","type":"practiceareas","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/domaines-de-pratique-2\/contrats-violations-litiges\/","title":{"rendered":"Contrats"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>La formation d&#039;un contrat de base n\u00e9cessite une offre et l&#039;acceptation de cette offre, un consentement mutuel aux conditions, l&#039;intention d&#039;\u00eatre li\u00e9 par ces conditions et une certaine mesure de consid\u00e9ration (<em>c&#039;est \u00e0 dire<\/em>, un avantage pour le promettant ou un pr\u00e9judice pour le cr\u00e9ancier). Les actes gratuits et les obligations l\u00e9gales existantes ne sont pas consid\u00e9r\u00e9s comme des contreparties. Les principales d\u00e9fenses invoqu\u00e9es par les parties contre l&#039;ex\u00e9cution d&#039;un contrat comprennent l&#039;iniquit\u00e9, la fraude, l&#039;erreur et la contrainte \u00e9conomique. La fraude peut \u00eatre dans l&#039;incitation ou dans le m\u00e9moire (<em>c&#039;est \u00e0 dire<\/em>, lorsqu&#039;une personne est amen\u00e9e \u00e0 signer un document sans en conna\u00eetre ou en comprendre la nature, le contenu ou les cons\u00e9quences). Sur la base de ces types de d\u00e9fenses \u00e0 l&#039;ex\u00e9cution d&#039;un contrat, un demandeur peut choisir de r\u00e9silier le contrat ou peut choisir de faire r\u00e9former le contrat par le tribunal (<em>c&#039;est \u00e0 dire<\/em>, restating intended terms or clarify intent where lacking in the contract).<\/p>\n<p>At variance with defenses to enforcement are the various ways parties can breach contracts.\u00a0 Breaches may be anticipatory, based upon a party\u2019s failure to perform or delay in performance, or breaching the implied covenant in all contracts of good faith and fair dealing.\u00a0 Generally, when a party breaches the contract, the non-breaching party must notice the breaching party of its breach in order not to waive the breach while the parties continue under the contract.\u00a0 Even with notification made, however, the non-breaching party is not allowed to terminate the contract based upon the noticed breach by the other party.\u00a0 Breaching parties often assert defenses for their failure to perform under the contract, such as, performance is impossible, the other party has engaged in conduct that frustrated the breaching party\u2019s ability to perform, waiver, the other party\u2019s breach, a condition precedent to the breaching party\u2019s performance failed to occur, and <em>force majeure<\/em> clauses.<\/p>\n<p>Damages from breach of contract differ significantly from those that attach to the enforcement defenses.\u00a0 Breach of contract damages may be expectancy damages (direct or consequential), lost profits, reliance damages (as an alternative to expectancy damages, <em>c&#039;est \u00e0 dire<\/em>, ce que la partie non fautive aurait gagn\u00e9 si sa contrepartie avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e), la restitution, les dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats nominaux et liquid\u00e9s et, dans certains cas, l&#039;obligation pour la partie fautive d&#039;ex\u00e9cuter le contrat et, dans de rares cas, des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats punitifs. \u00c0 New York, l&#039;incapacit\u00e9 de la partie non fautive \u00e0 att\u00e9nuer ses dommages entra\u00eenera une incapacit\u00e9 \u00e0 recouvrer les pertes qui auraient pu \u00eatre \u00e9vit\u00e9es gr\u00e2ce aux efforts et aux d\u00e9penses raisonnables de la partie non fautive.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La formation d&#039;un contrat de base n\u00e9cessite une offre et l&#039;acceptation de cette offre, un consentement mutuel aux conditions, l&#039;intention d&#039;\u00eatre li\u00e9 par ces conditions et une certaine mesure de consid\u00e9ration (c&#039;est-\u00e0-dire un avantage pour\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":141,"template":"","practiceareas_category":[747],"class_list":["post-5600","practiceareas","type-practiceareas","status-publish","hentry","practiceareas_category-business-litigation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas\/5600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/practiceareas"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas\/5600\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"practiceareas_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practiceareas_category?post=5600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}