{"id":2724,"date":"2020-05-19T19:03:26","date_gmt":"2020-05-19T23:03:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/2nd-circuit-says-hoosick-falls-pi-claims-are-fair-game\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:39:09","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:39:09","slug":"2nd-circuit-says-hoosick-falls-pi-claims-are-fair-game","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/libros-blancos\/2nd-circuit-says-hoosick-falls-pi-claims-are-fair-game\/","title":{"rendered":"El segundo circuito dice que las reclamaciones de IP de Hoosick Falls son un juego justo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The ruling affirms Judge Kahn&#8217;s 2017 decision to allow claims by residents of the Village of Hoosick Falls, New York, for damages related to medical monitoring to advance, as well as their personal injury, property damage, trespass and nuisance claims. The residents say they ingested PFOA-laced water as a result of contamination from one or more Saint-Gobain or Honeywell manufacturing facilities that operated at various times within the village. Several of the residents have elevated levels of PFOA in their blood, according to the suits.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El fallo confirma la decisi\u00f3n del juez Kahn de 2017 de permitir que avancen los reclamos de los residentes de Village of Hoosick Falls, Nueva York, por da\u00f1os relacionados con el control m\u00e9dico, as\u00ed como...<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":165,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[57,88,96,275,307,368],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2724","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-hunter-shkolnik","whitepaper_category-hoosick-falls-water","whitepaper_category-pfoa-water-contamination","whitepaper_category-environmental-contamination","whitepaper_category-water","whitepaper_category-health-and-safety","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2724"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}