{"id":2708,"date":"2020-04-09T15:28:19","date_gmt":"2020-04-09T19:28:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/beckers-hospital-review-on-united-cigna-viant-lawsuits\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:38:13","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:38:13","slug":"beckers-hospital-review-on-united-cigna-viant-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/libros-blancos\/beckers-hospital-review-on-united-cigna-viant-lawsuits\/","title":{"rendered":"Becker&#039;s Hospital Review sobre las demandas de United, Cigna y Viant"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The behavioral health units of UnitedHealthcare and Cigna face four class-action lawsuits claiming the insurers conspired with a third-party company to underpay providers and balance bill patients hundreds of millions of dollars.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuits, filed by law firm Napoli Shkolnik April 5, accuse United Behavioral Health and Cigna Behavioral Health of using Viant as a middleman company to systematically lower payments to out-of-network outpatient providers for substance abuse and mental health treatment. The lawsuit alleges providers got less than 5 percent of what they were owed.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Las unidades de salud del comportamiento de UnitedHealthcare y Cigna enfrentan cuatro demandas colectivas que alegan que las aseguradoras conspiraron con una empresa externa para pagar menos a los proveedores y facturar a los pacientes cientos de millones...<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":180,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[61,287,298,303,304,309],"whitepaper-source":[296],"class_list":["post-2708","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-class-action","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper_category-insurance","whitepaper_category-erisa","whitepaper_category-parity","whitepaper_category-insurance-claims","whitepaper-source-beckers-hospital-review"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2708\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2708"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}