{"id":2646,"date":"2019-10-30T19:07:31","date_gmt":"2019-10-30T23:07:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/hunter-shkolnik-quoted-on-tevas-agreement-proposal\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:34:24","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:34:24","slug":"hunter-shkolnik-quoted-on-tevas-agreement-proposal","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/libros-blancos\/hunter-shkolnik-quoted-on-tevas-agreement-proposal\/","title":{"rendered":"Hunter Shkolnik citado en la propuesta de acuerdo de Teva"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>J&amp;J, Teva offer a massive\u00a0$48B combined to wrap opioid suits, but not all plaintiffs are on board<\/p>\n<p>With reports like that in the ether, it\u2019s no wonder some plaintiffs are\u00a0reticent to sign on to the \u201cframework deal\u201d that includes the\u00a0Teva and J&amp;J offers, along with\u00a0additional deals with three drug distributors.<\/p>\n<p>Officials in at least four states have\u00a0pushed back\u00a0against the proposal, arguing that Teva\u2019s agreement is \u201covervalued to make the settlement look better,\u201d Hunter Shkolnik, a lawyer on a plaintiffs executive committee, told Reuters.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>J&amp;J, Teva ofrecen un $48B masivo combinado para envolver trajes de opioides, pero no todos los demandantes est\u00e1n de acuerdo Con informes como ese en el \u00e9ter, no es de extra\u00f1ar que algunos demandantes sean reticentes...<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":237,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[57,75,98,253,254],"whitepaper-source":[326],"class_list":["post-2646","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-hunter-shkolnik","whitepaper_category-opioids-litigation","whitepaper_category-ohio-opioid-lawyers","whitepaper_category-opioid-crisis","whitepaper_category-opioid-epidemic","whitepaper-source-fiercepharma-com"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2646"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}