{"id":2592,"date":"2019-08-02T19:31:58","date_gmt":"2019-08-02T23:31:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-lawsuit-over-provider-payments\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:31:17","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:31:17","slug":"bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-demanda-sobre-pagos-proveedor","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/libros-blancos\/bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-demanda-sobre-pagos-proveedor\/","title":{"rendered":"BCBS of MI Golpea con demanda $40M por pagos a proveedores"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan faces a lawsuit filed on behalf of mental health and substance abuse<br \/>\ntreatment providers that accused the insurer of underpaying claims.<\/p>\n<p>New York City-based law firm Napoli Shkolnik filed the lawsuit on behalf of four substance abuse treatment<br \/>\ncenters in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The lawsuit argues BCBS of<br \/>\nMichigan failed to properly pay for substance abuse treatment and other care for behavioral health disorders.<br \/>\nThe plaintiffs claimed BCBS of Michigan underpaid claims for 4,000 patients, and seeks more than $40 million.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan se enfrenta a una demanda presentada en nombre de los proveedores de tratamiento de salud mental y abuso de sustancias que acusaron a la aseguradora de pagar reclamaciones de forma insuficiente. Con sede en la ciudad de Nueva York\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":291,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[287,293],"whitepaper-source":[296],"class_list":["post-2592","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper_category-healthcare","whitepaper-source-beckers-hospital-review"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2592\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2592"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}