{"id":2466,"date":"2017-08-04T16:15:49","date_gmt":"2017-08-04T20:15:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/uber-class-achieves-a-small-victory\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:26:52","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:26:52","slug":"uber-clase-logra-una-pequena-victoria","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/libros-blancos\/uber-clase-logra-una-pequena-victoria\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Class logra una peque\u00f1a victoria"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El mes pasado, un tribunal federal de Carolina del Norte otorg\u00f3 certificaci\u00f3n condicional a una demanda colectiva presentada contra <a href=\"\/es\/areas-de-practica-2\/litigios-comerciales\/super-clase-accion\/\">Uber<\/a> by several of its drivers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).<\/p>\n<p>Now, plaintiffs in the case can seek out other drivers who feel they have been wronged by the company and who have opted out of their arbitration agreement with Uber to join the class, giving the plaintiffs 18,000 drivers, and potential recruits, to choose from. An attorney for the plaintiffs, heralded this decision and claimed it now enables Uber drivers around the country to \u201cband together to challenge Uber\u2019s misclassification\u201d of the drivers.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El mes pasado, un tribunal federal de Carolina del Norte otorg\u00f3 certificaci\u00f3n condicional a una demanda colectiva presentada contra Uber por varios de sus conductores en virtud de la Ley de normas laborales justas (FLSA). Ahora,\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":590,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[64],"whitepaper-source":[228],"class_list":["post-2466","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper-source-working-solutions-nyc"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2466"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}