Powerless flight is an extremely popular diversion. Aficionados say it is the closest thing to literally soaring like a bird. Soaring usually involves catching air currents. That could be upward drafts bouncing off mountains, rising warm air currents, or atmospheric waves. Obviously, glider pilots must possess a great deal of skill. And, they must always be able to count on their equipment.<\/p>\n
In many respects, New York glider accidents are a lot like accidentes de peatones<\/a>. Pedestrian-auto crashes are quite rare but almost always involve catastrophic injuries. The same thing applies in soaring. About 80 percent of glider accidents occur during takeoffs or landings.<\/p>\n A Ley de N\u00e1poles<\/a>, muchos de nuestros abogados de accidentes de aviaci\u00f3n son pilotos. Esa experiencia les da una perspectiva \u00fanica en estos casos. En muchos casos, esa percepci\u00f3n le da una ventaja. Por ejemplo, los abogados de Napoli Law entienden la interacci\u00f3n entre los diferentes tipos de negligencia en los accidentes de planeadores en Nueva York. Son capaces de comunicar esa perspectiva a un jurado.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Estad\u00edsticamente, los planeadores son tres veces m\u00e1s peligrosos que los veh\u00edculos motorizados. Cada a\u00f1o, hay alrededor de una muerte por cada 6.000 veh\u00edculos de motor. Pero hay alrededor de una muerte por cada 2.000 planeadores. La tasa de lesiones graves es incluso m\u00e1s alta que eso. Algunas de estas lesiones graves incluyen:<\/p>\n Los da\u00f1os en las reclamaciones por accidentes de planeadores en Nueva York generalmente incluyen compensaci\u00f3n por p\u00e9rdidas econ\u00f3micas, como facturas m\u00e9dicas, y p\u00e9rdidas no econ\u00f3micas, como dolor y sufrimiento. En algunos casos, tambi\u00e9n pueden estar disponibles da\u00f1os punitivos adicionales.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Takeoff crashes often involve multiple people. In addition to a pilot, there is usually someone on the ground helping the craft take off. Either person can make a mistake. A negligence claim is not really about \u201cblaming\u201d someone for the accident. Instead, negligence claims hold tortfeasors (negligent actors) responsible for their mistakes. And that\u2019s something we must all deal with.<\/p>\n Launch accidents often involve defective products as well. Gliders are such delicate machines that even a slight product defect can cause tragedy. Some common issues include:<\/p>\n In both human error and defective product cases, insurance companies often assert a number of defenses. Comparative fault is the most common negligence defense. For example, an insurance company might admit that its insured towed the plane too slowly, but the pilot had the flaps in the wrong position, and that error caused the crash.<\/p>\n New York is a pure comparative fault state. The judge divides damages in these cases based solely on the percentage of fault. Even if the piloto<\/a> is 99 percent responsible for the crash, the victim still recovers a proportional share of damages in New York.<\/p>\n Improper use is one of the most common defective product defenses. But for the defense to apply, the victim must have grossly misused the product. That means something like using a lawnmower to trim ivy on a brick wall. Many defective product cases involve strict liability claims, and this defense may be entirely inapplicable.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The tortfeasor or product manufacturer may not be the only parties responsible for damages in New York glider accident claims.<\/p>\n Some companies rent glider rides to passengers. These companies could be liable for damages under one of the following theories:<\/p>\n Estas teor\u00edas tambi\u00e9n pueden aplicarse a las escuelas de instrucci\u00f3n de pilotos de planeadores. Estas instituciones tienen el deber de brindar a los estudiantes los conocimientos y las habilidades necesarias para que est\u00e9n seguros. No tienen el deber de simplemente entregar diplomas.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n En 1994, los legisladores aprobaron la Ley de Revitalizaci\u00f3n de la Aviaci\u00f3n General. GARA brinda a los fabricantes de aeronaves, incluidos los fabricantes de planeadores, inmunidad contra acciones de productos defectuosos en accidentes de aviaci\u00f3n general<\/a>. For this immunity to apply, the aircraft must have been at least eighteen years old at the time of the accident.<\/p>\n Most gliders meet this age requirement. But this law was designed to eliminate frivolous lawsuits and not stop meritorious ones. So, there are a number of GARA workarounds, including:<\/p>\n Additionally, if the aircraft had been modified, the clock may start over. For example, if a pilot worked on the flaps in 2010, the manufacturer could be liable for any flap-related defects until 2028.<\/p>\nLesiones Comunes en Accidentes de Planeadores<\/h2>\n
\n
Responsabilidad de primera persona en accidentes de planeadores en Nueva York<\/h2>\n
\n
Responsabilidad subsidiaria<\/h2>\n
\n
Cuestiones especiales con respecto a accidentes de planeadores en Nueva York y productos defectuosos<\/h3>\n
\n