{"id":8379,"date":"2021-01-21T21:23:54","date_gmt":"2021-01-22T02:23:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/uncategorized\/aviation-lawsuit-filed-against-boeing-regarding-hard-landing\/"},"modified":"2021-01-21T21:23:54","modified_gmt":"2021-01-22T02:23:54","slug":"aviacion-demanda-presentada-contra-boeing-sobre-aterrizaje-forzoso","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/article\/aviacion-demanda-presentada-contra-boeing-sobre-aterrizaje-forzoso\/","title":{"rendered":"Demanda de aviaci\u00f3n presentada contra Boeing por aterrizaje forzoso"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Los abogados que representan a las v\u00edctimas del vuelo 2193 de Pegasus anunciaron que se present\u00f3 una demanda contra The Boeing Company y el propietario de la aeronave. La demanda afirma reclamos de negligencia, responsabilidad del producto e incumplimiento de la garant\u00eda con respecto a un avi\u00f3n Boeing que se estrell\u00f3 en Estambul, Turqu\u00eda.<\/p>\n<p>El 5 de febrero de 2020, estaba programado que un vuelo comercial operado por Pegasus Airlines saliera del aeropuerto de Izmir Adnan Menderes y llegara al aeropuerto de Estambul-Sabiha G\u00f6k\u00e7en en Turqu\u00eda. A su llegada, la aeronave no pudo detenerse en la pista. La aeronave se estrell\u00f3 primero contra las antenas del Sistema de aterrizaje por instrumentos (&quot;ILS&quot;), luego contra una caseta de guardia y finalmente cay\u00f3 sobre el \u00e1rea a unos 30 metros de profundidad desde el comienzo de la pista. La aeronave involucrada era un avi\u00f3n comercial Boeing 737-86J.<\/p>\n<p>El resultado del accidente fue catastr\u00f3fico. El cuerpo de la aeronave se parti\u00f3 en tres pedazos tras chocar contra el muro de hormig\u00f3n y las alambradas que rodean el aeropuerto. Los motores, el tren de aterrizaje, las alas y algunas otras partes estaban esparcidas entre los escombros. De las 183 personas a bordo del vuelo 2193, 179 resultaron gravemente heridas. Tres individuos fueron asesinados.<\/p>\n<p>El abogado turco-estadounidense de los demandantes, Seyit A. Sahin, Esq. de HELP Law Offices LLC en Chicago declar\u00f3, \u201cno descansaremos hasta que prevalezca la justicia para todas las v\u00edctimas involucradas en este evento catastr\u00f3fico\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>La demanda alega que Boeing fue negligente en el dise\u00f1o y\/o fabricaci\u00f3n de los sistemas de freno autom\u00e1tico y freno de velocidad de la aeronave. Estos son sistemas automatizados que est\u00e1n destinados a reducir la velocidad del avi\u00f3n despu\u00e9s del aterrizaje. Sin embargo, en el vuelo 2193, estos sistemas fallaron. Los datos muestran que hubo un per\u00edodo de seis segundos en los que no se usaron los dispositivos de desaceleraci\u00f3n antes de que el piloto al mando se viera obligado a implementar el frenado manual.<\/p>\n<p>Abogado en representaci\u00f3n de los Demandantes, Hunter J. Shkolnik, Esq. Expres\u00f3 su preocupaci\u00f3n por los afectados. \u201cNuestros corazones est\u00e1n con las familias que tienen seres queridos heridos en este incidente evitable. Si bien no existe una compensaci\u00f3n que pueda reemplazar la p\u00e9rdida de vidas, estamos representando a los afectados para que se haga justicia a quienes causaron este tr\u00e1gico evento\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Napoli Shkolnik  is a national litigation firm providing representation to persons in class action lawsuits and complex commercial cases, as well as victims of environmental contamination disasters, aviation accidents, defective prescriptions drugs and medical devices, asbestos-related illnesses, and other serious personal injury matters.<\/p>\n<p>The firm\u2019s principal offices are in New York City with additional offices throughout the United States. Napoli Shkolnik \u2019s team of diverse attorneys and staff are readily available to assist individuals and communities, oftentimes in their native languages (including Turkish), with their legal needs. There are no upfront legal fees and Napoli Shkolnik only recovers money if they win your case.<\/p>\n<p><strong>T\u00fcrkiye&#039;deki sert ini\u015f ile ilgili olarak Boeing&#039;e Havac\u0131l\u0131k Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Pegasus &#039;un 2193 sefer say\u0131l\u0131 u\u00e7u\u015funun kazazedelerini temsil eden avukatlar, Boeing \u015eirketi ve u\u00e7ak sahibi hakk\u0131nda dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 duyurdu. Davada, T\u00fcrkiye&#039;nin \u0130stanbul \u015fehrinde d\u00fc\u015fen bir Boeing u\u00e7a\u011f\u0131yla ilgili ihmal, \u00fcr\u00fcn sorumlulu\u011fu ve garantinin ihlali iddialar\u0131 yer al\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<p>5 de febrero de 2020 tarihinde Pegasus Havayollar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fletilen ticari bir u\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n \u0130zmir Adnan Menderes Havaliman\u0131&#039;ndan kalkarak \u0130stanbul-Sabiha G\u00f6k\u00e7en Havaliman\u0131&#039;na varmas\u0131 planlan\u0131yordu. Var\u0131\u015fta u\u00e7ak pistte duramad\u0131. U\u00e7ak \u00f6nce Instrument Landing System (\u201cILS\u201d) antena, sonra da bir koruma kabinine \u00e7arpt\u0131 ve sonunda pist ba\u015f\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k 30 metros derinli\u011findeki alana d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. S\u00f6z konusu u\u00e7ak bir Boeing 737-86J ticari u\u00e7akt\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Kazan\u0131n sonucu felaketti. U\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6vdesi, havaalan\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen beton duvar ve tel \u00e7itlere \u00e7arpt\u0131ktan sonra \u00fc\u00e7 par\u00e7aya ayr\u0131ld\u0131. Motorlar, ini\u015f tak\u0131mlar\u0131, kanatlar ve di\u011fer baz\u0131 par\u00e7alar enkaz aras\u0131nda da\u011f\u0131ld\u0131. 2193 sefer say\u0131l\u0131 u\u00e7aktaki 183 ki\u015fiden 179&#039;u a\u011f\u0131r yaraland\u0131. \u00dc\u00e7 ki\u015fi hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti.<\/p>\n<p>Chicago&#039;daki HELP Hukuk Ofisi LLC&#039;den davac\u0131lar\u0131n T\u00fcrk -Amerikan Avukat\u0131 Seyit A. \u015eahin, \u201cBu feci olaydan etkilenen t\u00fcm ma\u011fdurlar i\u00e7in adalet yerini bulana kadar durmayaca\u011f\u0131z \u201d dedi.<\/p>\n<p>Dava, Boeing&#039;in u\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n aoutobrake ve speedbrake sistemlerinin tasar\u0131m\u0131 ve\/veya imalat\u0131nda ihmali oldu\u011funu iddia ediyor. Bunlar, u\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 touchdown&#039;dan sonra yava\u015flatmay\u0131 ama\u00e7layan otomatik sistemlerdir. Ancak, 2193 sefer say\u0131l\u0131 u\u00e7u\u015fta bu sistemler ar\u0131zaland\u0131. Veriler, kaptan pilotun manuel fren uygulamak zorunda kalmadan \u00f6nce yava\u015flama cihazlar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131 saniyelik bir s\u00fcre oldu\u011funu g\u00f6stermektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na avukat, Hunter J. Shkolnik, Esq. Olaydan etkilenenler i\u00e7in endi\u015felerini dile getirdi. \u201cBu \u00f6nlenebilir olayda kalbimiz yal\u0131nlar\u0131 yaralanan ailelerle beraber. Hi\u00e7bir tazminat can kayb\u0131n\u0131n yerini alamaz, bu trajik olaya neden olanlara adaletin uygulanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in olaydan etkilenenleri temsil ediyoruz.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Napoli Shkolnik , grup davalar\u0131 ve karma\u015f\u0131k ticari davalar\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra \u00e7evresel kirlenme felaketleri, havac\u0131l\u0131k kazalar\u0131, kusurlu re\u00e7eteler ila\u00e7lar ve t\u0131bbi cihazlar, asbestle ilgili hastal\u0131klar ve di\u011fer ciddi ki\u015fisel yaralanma konular\u0131nda ki\u015filere temsil sa\u011flayan ulusal bir hukuk firmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Firman\u0131n ana ofisleri New York&#8217;ta olup Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri&#8217;nde ek ofisleri bulunmaktad\u0131r. Napoli Shkolnik  \u00e7e\u015fitli avukat ve personel ekibi ile, \u00e7o\u011fu zaman kendi dillerinde (T\u00fcrk\u00e7e dahil) bireylere ve topluluklara yasal ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131 konusunda yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmaya haz\u0131rd\u0131r. Hi\u00e7bir \u00f6n yasal \u00fccret al\u0131nmamakta ve Napoli Shkolnik sadece davan\u0131z\u0131 kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda para kazanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Default\">","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Los abogados que representan a las v\u00edctimas del vuelo 2193 de Pegasus anunciaron que se present\u00f3 una demanda contra The Boeing Company y el propietario de la aeronave. La demanda afirma reclamos de negligencia, responsabilidad del producto y ...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":8380,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[771],"tags":[815,820,858,987,1037],"class_list":["post-8379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aviation-accidents","tag-general-negligence","tag-product-liability","tag-hunter-shkolnik","tag-wrongful-death","tag-aviation-accidents"],"acf":[],"page_builder_type":"gutenberg","gutenberg_data":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8379\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8380"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}