{"id":2584,"date":"2019-07-24T18:00:06","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T22:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/uber-class-action-settlement-update\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:30:55","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:30:55","slug":"uber-class-action-settlement-update","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/whitepapers\/uber-class-action-settlement-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber Class Action Settlement Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A California federal judge has tentatively approved an increased $395,000 settlement in a class action alleging Uber denied drivers their fair share of riders&#8217; payments, saying the deal is still on the low end, but fair.<\/p>\n<p>The revamped deal made three notable changes, according to Judge Alsup. Each class member will receive at least $20 from the settlement, and any class members who were set to receive more than $20 based on their driving histories will still receive the same amount they were to get under the previous deal, according to the order.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, Dulberg\u2019s attorneys at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law360.com\/firms\/napoli-shkolnik\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Napoli Shkolnik PLLC<\/a>\u00a0agreed to cap their request for attorneys fees at 25% of the net settlement amount, down from the nearly 30% they had previously requested.<\/p>\n<p>Dulberg and the class are represented by Salvatore C. Badala of Napoli Shkolnik PLLC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A California federal judge has tentatively approved an increased $395,000 settlement in a class action alleging Uber denied drivers their fair share of riders&#8217; payments, saying the deal is still&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":297,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[61,64,287],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2584","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-class-action","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2584"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}