{"id":2530,"date":"2018-11-08T19:44:59","date_gmt":"2018-11-09T00:44:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/law360-quotes-hunter-shkolnik-on-diabetes-drug-lawsuits\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:29:05","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:29:05","slug":"law360-quotes-hunter-shkolnik-on-diabetes-drug-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/whitepapers\/law360-quotes-hunter-shkolnik-on-diabetes-drug-lawsuits\/","title":{"rendered":"Law360 Quotes Hunter Shkolnik on Diabetes Drug Lawsuits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A California appeals court revived claims Tuesday that Merck &amp; Co. and other diabetes drugmakers failed to warn about their drugs&#8217; pancreatic cancer risks, finding a lower court erred in not considering scientific evidence the U.S. Food and Drug Administration hadn&#8217;t evaluated.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In light of the [Ninth] Circuit&#8217;s reversal of Judge Battaglia&#8217;s order, which the state court judge virtually adopted verbatim, this reversal of the state court preemption decision was expected,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/napoli-attorney\/hunter-shkolnik\/\">Hunter J. Shkolnik<\/a> of Napoli Shkolnik PLLC, counsel for the patients, told Law360.\u00a0&#8220;Both the federal court and state court rulings were improper, and now these families will be able to pursue their cases.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A California appeals court revived claims Tuesday that Merck &amp; Co. and other diabetes drugmakers failed to warn about their drugs&#8217; pancreatic cancer risks, finding a lower court erred in&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":352,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[57],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2530","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-hunter-shkolnik","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2530\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2530"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}