{"id":2481,"date":"2018-06-07T18:55:39","date_gmt":"2018-06-07T22:55:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:27:22","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:27:22","slug":"2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/whitepapers\/2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"2nd Circuit Revives 9\/11 Workers&#8217; Suit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A long-running legal battle between workers who say they became sick as a result of working in Lower Manhattan after the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks and the Battery Park City Authority was revived by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>Napoli Shkolnik of counsel <a href=\"\/napoli-attorney\/paul-napoli\/\">Paul Napoli<\/a>, who represented a portion of the appellants, said the BPCA had \u201cused every legal maneuver possible to avoid paying these claims,\u201d and this result was not unforeseen given the Court of Appeals\u2019 answer to the circuit\u2019s certified questions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re happy that finally these plaintiffs might finally have their time in court in front of Judge Hellerstein,\u201d Napoli said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A long-running legal battle between workers who say they became sick as a result of working in Lower Manhattan after the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks and the Battery Park City&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":401,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[59,69],"whitepaper-source":[79],"class_list":["post-2481","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-paul-napoli","whitepaper_category-world-trade-center","whitepaper-source-new-york-law-journal"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2481\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2481"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}