{"id":2697,"date":"2020-03-05T21:28:25","date_gmt":"2020-03-06T02:28:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/federal-judge-agreed-to-add-flint-claims-to-case\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:37:27","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:37:27","slug":"bundesrichter-stimmten-zu-dem-fall-feuerstein-anspruche-hinzuzufugen","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/weise-papiere\/bundesrichter-stimmten-zu-dem-fall-feuerstein-anspruche-hinzuzufugen\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesrichter einigte sich darauf, Flint-Anspr\u00fcche zum Fall hinzuzuf\u00fcgen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>U.S District Judge Linda V. Parker on Tuesday agreed to add about 350 plaintiffs to a larger Federal Tort Claims Act suit that says the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was negligent in its response to the water crisis.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The standard would normally be, you do consolidate them because you are duplicating efforts,\u201d said Hunter Shkolnik of Napoli Shkolnik PLLC, who represents plaintiffs in Flint cases before both judges. \u201cJudicial economy would support consolidation before Levy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Die US-Bezirksrichterin Linda V. Parker stimmte am Dienstag zu, etwa 350 Kl\u00e4ger in eine gr\u00f6\u00dfere Klage nach dem Federal Tort Claims Act aufzunehmen, in der es hei\u00dft, die US-Umweltschutzbeh\u00f6rde sei\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":191,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[57,66,67,275,307],"whitepaper-source":[63],"class_list":["post-2697","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-hunter-shkolnik","whitepaper_category-flint-water-crisis","whitepaper_category-lead-exposure","whitepaper_category-environmental-contamination","whitepaper_category-water","whitepaper-source-law360"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2697\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2697"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}