{"id":2643,"date":"2019-10-24T15:17:35","date_gmt":"2019-10-24T19:17:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/historic-260m-opioid-deal\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:34:18","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:34:18","slug":"historischer-260-m-opioid-deal","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/weise-papiere\/historischer-260-m-opioid-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Historischer $260m-Opioid-Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The deal settles claims brought by Ohio\u2019s Cuya hoga and Summit counties, which had accused the companies of fuelling a nationwide opioid crisis. Some 400,000 US overdose deaths between 1997 and 2017 were linked to opioids, ac cording to government data.<\/p>\n<p>The trial was to be a so-called bellwether, or test trial, that was meant to help shape a broader settlement of some 2,600 lawsuits pending over the toll opioids have taken on local communities and the nation.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Der Deal regelt Anspr\u00fcche der Grafschaften Cuya Hoga und Summit in Ohio, die die Unternehmen beschuldigt hatten, eine landesweite Opioidkrise angeheizt zu haben. Rund 400.000 Todesf\u00e4lle durch \u00dcberdosierung in den USA zwischen 1997 \u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":240,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[98,253,254,57,75],"whitepaper-source":[277],"class_list":["post-2643","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-ohio-opioid-lawyers","whitepaper_category-opioid-crisis","whitepaper_category-opioid-epidemic","whitepaper_category-hunter-shkolnik","whitepaper_category-opioids-litigation","whitepaper-source-reuters"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2643"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}