{"id":2592,"date":"2019-08-02T19:31:58","date_gmt":"2019-08-02T23:31:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/bcbs-of-mi-hit-with-40m-lawsuit-over-provider-payments\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:31:17","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:31:17","slug":"bcbs-of-mi-erfolgte-mit-40m-klage-wegen-anbieterzahlungen","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/weise-papiere\/bcbs-of-mi-erfolgte-mit-40m-klage-wegen-anbieterzahlungen\/","title":{"rendered":"BCBS of MI Hit mit $40M-Klage wegen Anbieterzahlungen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan faces a lawsuit filed on behalf of mental health and substance abuse<br \/>\ntreatment providers that accused the insurer of underpaying claims.<\/p>\n<p>New York City-based law firm Napoli Shkolnik filed the lawsuit on behalf of four substance abuse treatment<br \/>\ncenters in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. The lawsuit argues BCBS of<br \/>\nMichigan failed to properly pay for substance abuse treatment and other care for behavioral health disorders.<br \/>\nThe plaintiffs claimed BCBS of Michigan underpaid claims for 4,000 patients, and seeks more than $40 million.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan sieht sich einer Klage gegen\u00fcber, die im Namen von Anbietern von Behandlungen f\u00fcr psychische Gesundheit und Drogenmissbrauch eingereicht wurde, in denen der Versicherer beschuldigt wird, Anspr\u00fcche nicht ausreichend bezahlt zu haben. In New York City ans\u00e4ssig\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":291,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[287,293],"whitepaper-source":[296],"class_list":["post-2592","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-commercial-litigation","whitepaper_category-healthcare","whitepaper-source-beckers-hospital-review"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2592\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2592"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}