{"id":2526,"date":"2018-10-10T16:09:26","date_gmt":"2018-10-10T20:09:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/federal-judge-gives-prelim-approval-for-uber-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:28:58","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:28:58","slug":"bundesrichter-erteilt-vorlaufige-bewilligung-uber-vergleich","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/weise-papiere\/bundesrichter-erteilt-vorlaufige-bewilligung-uber-vergleich\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesrichter erteilt vorl\u00e4ufige Genehmigung f\u00fcr Uber-Vergleich"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ein Bundesrichter in San Francisco hat einem $350.000-Vergleich zwischen Uber Technologies Inc und bis zu 4.600 der eigenen vorl\u00e4ufig zugestimmt <a href=\"\/de\/praxisbereiche-2\/geschaftsprozess\/uber-sammelklage\/\">Fahrer im ganzen Land, die sagen, dass die Mitfahrzentrale sie unterbezahlt hat<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge William Alsup on Tuesday said the deal amounted to about half of the maximum damages the drivers claimed they would recover if they won the case, and was fair and reasonable.<\/p>\n<p>Napoli Shkolnik represents the drivers.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ein Bundesrichter in San Francisco hat eine $350.000-Vergleich zwischen Uber Technologies Inc und bis zu 4.600 seiner Fahrer im ganzen Land vorl\u00e4ufig genehmigt, die sagen\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":358,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[64],"whitepaper-source":[210],"class_list":["post-2526","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper-source-reuters-legal"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2526\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2526"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}