{"id":2505,"date":"2018-08-26T16:18:37","date_gmt":"2018-08-26T20:18:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/uber-settlement-on-the-horizon\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:28:15","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:28:15","slug":"uber-siedlung-am-horizont","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/weise-papiere\/uber-siedlung-am-horizont\/","title":{"rendered":"Uber-Siedlung am Horizont?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Seit fast dem Anfang, <a href=\"\/de\/praxisbereiche-2\/geschaftsprozess\/uber-sammelklage\/\">\u00dcber<\/a> has paid its drivers 80 percent of a given fare. However, in the lawsuit, lead plaintiff Martin Dulberg claims that the company has now changed the way it calculates what that fare is. The result is that the company consistently pays between 70 and 80 percent\u2014but not the\u00a0full\u00a080 percent\u2014of what the fare should be.<\/p>\n<p>This, plaintiffs claimed, is in violation of the December 2015 work agreement (known as the Technology Services Agreement, or &#8220;TSA&#8221;) that they and many other drivers signed. As they opted out of arbitration, they can sue and band together as a class.<\/p>\n<p>The lead plaintiff, Martin Dulberg, is represented by Napoli Shkolnik PLLC.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uber hat seinen Fahrern fast von Anfang an 80 Prozent eines bestimmten Fahrpreises gezahlt. In der Klage behauptet der Hauptkl\u00e4ger Martin Dulberg jedoch, dass sich das Unternehmen nun ge\u00e4ndert hat\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":376,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[64],"whitepaper-source":[184],"class_list":["post-2505","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-uber-drivers","whitepaper-source-ars-technica"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2505\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2505"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}