{"id":2481,"date":"2018-06-07T18:55:39","date_gmt":"2018-06-07T22:55:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/whitepapers\/2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T02:27:22","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T06:27:22","slug":"2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit","status":"publish","type":"whitepapers","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/weise-papiere\/2nd-circuit-revives-9-11-workers-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"2nd Circuit belebt die Arbeiterklage des 11. September wieder"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A long-running legal battle between workers who say they became sick as a result of working in Lower Manhattan after the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks and the Battery Park City Authority was revived by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>Napoli Shkolnik of counsel <a href=\"\/de\/napoli-attorney\/paul-napoli\/\">Paul Neapel<\/a>, who represented a portion of the appellants, said the BPCA had \u201cused every legal maneuver possible to avoid paying these claims,\u201d and this result was not unforeseen given the Court of Appeals\u2019 answer to the circuit\u2019s certified questions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re happy that finally these plaintiffs might finally have their time in court in front of Judge Hellerstein,\u201d Napoli said.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ein langj\u00e4hriger Rechtsstreit zwischen Arbeitern, die sagen, dass sie krank geworden sind, weil sie nach den Terroranschl\u00e4gen vom 11. September in Lower Manhattan gearbeitet haben, und dem Battery Park City\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":401,"template":"","whitepaper_category":[59,69],"whitepaper-source":[79],"class_list":["post-2481","whitepapers","type-whitepapers","status-publish","hentry","whitepaper_category-paul-napoli","whitepaper_category-world-trade-center","whitepaper-source-new-york-law-journal"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/whitepapers"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepapers\/2481\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"whitepaper_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper_category?post=2481"},{"taxonomy":"whitepaper-source","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/whitepaper-source?post=2481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}