{"id":6397,"date":"2016-03-07T15:22:18","date_gmt":"2016-03-07T20:22:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:10028\/verdicts\/650-million-settlement\/"},"modified":"2022-06-27T00:56:41","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T04:56:41","slug":"650-millionen-siedlung","status":"publish","type":"verdicts","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/urteile\/650-millionen-siedlung\/","title":{"rendered":"$650 Millionen Abrechnung"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Das Unternehmen hat diesen Vergleich ausgehandelt, um die Anspr\u00fcche von rund 4.000 Pradaxa\u00ae-Anwendern zu kl\u00e4ren, die behaupteten, durch das Medikament gesch\u00e4digt worden zu sein.<\/p>\n<p>Risks associated with stroke among atrial fibrillation sufferers. Users utilizing Pradaxa started suffering bleeding by means of this medication. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. including its affiliated businesses was driven by the Court to enter into a settlement with 4000 users of this anticoagulant that Napoli Shkolnik legal group was representing. Consequently, Boehringer Ingelheim consented To an amount of $650 million in settlement. Paul and his company ensured at least the wounded users of Pradaxa received warranted fiscal compensation and justice.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Das Unternehmen handelte diesen Vergleich aus, um die Anspr\u00fcche von etwa 4.000 Pradaxa\u00ae-Anwendern zu kl\u00e4ren, die behaupteten, durch das Medikament gesch\u00e4digt worden zu sein. Schlaganfallrisiken bei Vorhofflimmern\u2026<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":6398,"menu_order":0,"template":"","verdict_category":[758],"class_list":["post-6397","verdicts","type-verdicts","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","verdict_category-pharmaceutical-litigation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/verdicts"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/6397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"verdict_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict_category?post=6397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}