{"id":17437,"date":"2024-04-09T13:42:46","date_gmt":"2024-04-09T17:42:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.napolilaw.com\/?post_type=verdicts&#038;p=17437"},"modified":"2024-04-09T13:42:47","modified_gmt":"2024-04-09T17:42:47","slug":"1-185-billion-settlement-with-dupont-chemours-corteva","status":"publish","type":"verdicts","link":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/urteile\/1-185-billion-settlement-with-dupont-chemours-corteva\/","title":{"rendered":"$1,185 Milliarden Vergleich mit Dupont, Chemours, Corteva"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Napoli Shkolnik freut sich, einen gro\u00dfen Durchbruch im Streben nach Gerechtigkeit f\u00fcr Wasserversorger und ihre Gemeinden bekannt zu geben, die von der PFAS-Kontamination in den Vereinigten Staaten betroffen sind. In sorgf\u00e4ltiger Zusammenarbeit mit unseren Co-Leitern haben wir die wesentlichen Bedingungen mit den Beklagten DuPont, Chemours und Corteva hinsichtlich ihrer Verantwortung f\u00fcr die PFAS-Kontamination \u00f6ffentlicher Wassersysteme und die damit verbundenen Behandlungskosten erfolgreich gekl\u00e4rt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.businesswire.com\/news\/home\/20240208235431\/en\/Historic-1.18-Billion-Settlement-Approved-with-DuPont-to-Clean-America%E2%80%99s-Water-Supplies?_gl=1*1rto677*_ga*ODA5MzYyMzE1LjE2OTg3NjU4NzA.*_ga_ZQWF70T3FK*MTcwNzQ4NzkzNy4zNi4xLjE3MDc0ODk5MDYuMjkuMC4w\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Historic $1.18 Billion Settlement Approved with DuPont to Clean America\u2019s Water Supplies<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Napoli Shkolnik is pleased to announce a major breakthrough in the pursuit of justice for water providers and their communities affected by PFAS contamination in the United States. Working diligently&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","verdict_category":[759],"class_list":["post-17437","verdicts","type-verdicts","status-publish","hentry","verdict_category-environmental-litigation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/17437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/verdicts"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdicts\/17437\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"verdict_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napolilaw.lemonadestand.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict_category?post=17437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}