Airplane mechanics are much more than just women and men with wrenches. These individuals are highly-trained, and highly-paid, professionals with a high degree of skill in a number of areas. For example, General Aviation mechanics must work on everything from single-seat propeller aircraft to sophisticated jets that carry more than a dozen passengers. Specifically, airplane mechanics must repair current problems and predict future failures.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, mechanically-related F\u00e4lle von Flugzeugabst\u00fcrzen<\/a> present some intricate legal issues. It is not easy to determine fault and establish liability. The mechanic can also raise a number of effective defenses in these proceedings.<\/p>\n Given all these complexities, you need an effective lawyer to stand up for your rights in the event of an aviation crash. At Neapel-Gesetz<\/a>, unsere Anw\u00e4lte f\u00fcr Flugunf\u00e4lle sind sehr erfahrene und engagierte Fachleute. Sie haben die Werkzeuge, die sie brauchen, um einen \u00fcberzeugenden Fall aufzubauen. Vielleicht noch wichtiger ist, dass sie die Leidenschaft haben, den Fall bis zum Ende durchzuziehen. Diese Kombination f\u00fchrt oft zu Ergebnissen, die Ihre Erwartungen \u00fcbertreffen.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In many ways, airplane mechanics have almost a fiduciary duty towards airplane owners and passengers. Like a stock broker, a mechanic has almost unlimited access to a very personal asset. Like a lawyer, a mechanic is the only person between the aircraft owner and a potential tragedy. And like a doctor, an airplane owner is entirely dependent on the mechanic to keep the aircraft safe.<\/p>\n As a result, the standard of care is much higher in these cases than it is in car crashes. The Code of Federal Regulations sets out an airplane mechanic\u2019s high duty in this realm. That duty includes:<\/p>\n Diese FAA-Standards sind nur das Minimum. Gesetzlich m\u00fcssen Mechaniker und andere Fachleute den Industriestandard erf\u00fcllen oder \u00fcbertreffen. Je nach geografischem Gebiet, Flugzeugtyp und anderen Faktoren k\u00f6nnte der Industriestandard viel h\u00f6her sein.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Sobald ein Anwalt den angemessenen Sorgfaltsstandard festlegt, beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit. Opfer\/Kl\u00e4ger haben in diesem Bereich die Beweislast. Daher m\u00fcssen sie zus\u00e4tzlich zur gesetzlichen Verpflichtung Folgendes festlegen:<\/p>\n \u00dcbliche Einwendungen bei unsachgem\u00e4\u00dfer Flugzeugwartung und anderen Fahrl\u00e4ssigkeitsf\u00e4llen sind Mitverschulden und Risiko\u00fcbernahme. Mitverschulden ist im Grunde eine M\u00f6glichkeit, die Schuld am Unfall auf das Opfer abzuw\u00e4lzen. Diese Behauptungen beinhalten oft Behauptungen von Pilotenfehler<\/a>.<\/p>\n Assumption of the risk is a similar doctrine. But there is a big difference between getting into a plane, which has a theoretical risk of crashing, and getting into a plane which the person knows to be unreasonably dangerous.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Once fault is established, the battle is not over yet. At Napoli Law, we are committed to both justice and compensation in these cases. Compensation is sometimes hard to obtain. The FAA usually does not require mechanics to carry insurance.<\/p>\n So, vicarious liability is often important in these claims. Third party liability gives a victim\/plaintiff an additional source of compensation. Some common theories include:<\/p>\n New York and most other states are modified joint and several liability states. If there are multiple tortfeasors, the judge usually apportions damages among them based on their percentage of fault.<\/p>\nPflicht in F\u00e4llen unsachgem\u00e4\u00dfer Wartung<\/h2>\n
\n
Feststellung von Fahrl\u00e4ssigkeit in F\u00e4llen unsachgem\u00e4\u00dfer Wartung<\/h2>\n
\n
Haftungsfragen<\/h2>\n
\n